HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 29312 of 2026 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE PRAKASH PADIA, J. HON'BLE VIVEK SARAN, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Mohd. Afzal, learned counsel for the respondent no.3 and learned Standing Counsel for the State- Respondents. 2. It is admitted between the parties that the relief sought in the petition has already been granted, hence no further orders are required to be passed in the matter and the same may be dismissed as having become infructuous. 3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. September 17, 2026 Gaurav Kuls Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Akhand Pratap Tripathi Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Mohd. Afzal (Vivek Saran,J.) (Prakash Padia,J.) Sushil Kumar .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- GAURAV KULSHRESTHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad