Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 7457 (JHR)

BABLU RAVIDAS v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./2764/2026 · 2026-04-30

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:JHHC:12815] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.2764 of 2026 ------ Bablu Ravidas, Aged about 32 years, S/O – Ashok Ram, Resident of – Shanti Nagar, P.O. + P.S.- McCluskieganj, District- Ranchi, Jharkhand. .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Priyanshu Nilesh, Advocate For the State : Mrs. Mohua Palit, Addl.P.P. ------ Order No:-03 Dated:-30-04-2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Barkagaon P.S. Case No. 220 of 2022 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 342, 323, 395, 386, 506 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner committed dacoity and looted Rs.15,000/- at gunpoint from the driver of the informant after assaulting him. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is then submitted that the petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. and without putting him under T.I. Parade as mentioned in para-3 of the supplementary affidavit, charge sheet has been submitted against the petitioner. It is also submitted that no witness has been examined in this case. It is further submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 01.02.2026 as is evident from para-13 of the instant bail application. It is next submitted that the co- accused, with similar allegations, has already been admitted to bail by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 13.04.2023 in B.A. No. 2101 of 2023. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner undertakes to co-operate with the trial of the case and also undertakes not to annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate-1st Class, Hazaribagh in connection with Barkagaon P.S. Case No. 220 of 2022 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated:- 30.04.2026 Saroj/