Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 7455 (UTT)

ANCHAL DEVI v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPMS/1905/2026 · 2026-07-01

Manoj Kumar Tiwari

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

UKHC010107592026 2026:UHC:5228 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WPMS/1905/2026 Anchal Devi --Petitioner Versus State Of Uttarakhand --Respondent Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J. Mr. Aakash Sanyal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Tarun Mohan, Brief Holder for the State. Mr. Shailendra Nauriyal, Advocate for the University/respondent No. 2. 2. By means of this writ petition, petitioner has sought the following relief: “Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus, commanding the respondent No. 02 to conduct the backlog exam of the petitioner for two subjects i.e. Business Communication & Law of Contract in the academic session 2026-27 and declare the result of the petitioner and issue degree to the petitioner for BBA. LLB course. 3. After arguing for a while, learned counsel appearing for petitioner submits that petitioner be permitted to make representation to the competent authority in the University. UKHC010107592026 2026:UHC:5228 4. Mr. Shailendra Nauriyal, learned counsel appearing for University submits that he has no objection if writ petition is disposed of in terms of prayer made by petitioner’s counsel. 5. The writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of by permitting petitioner to make representation. If he makes representation within 10 days from today, decision thereupon shall be taken by Registrar of Veer Madho Singh Bhandari Utarakhand Technical University, as per law, within six weeks thereafter. (Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.) 01.07.2026 Mahinder/