ORDER 1. Leave granted. 2. We are not adverting to all the facts and evidence adduced by the parties before the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal (for short, ‘MACT’) considering the nature of the order we propose to pass in this appeal. 3. This appeal would call in question the Order passed by the High Court whereby appellant’s appeal against dismissal of his claim petition by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Chikkamagaluru in MVC No. 640/2014, has been dismissed by the High Court. 4. On the date of the accident, appellant was a pillion rider on a motorcycle bearing No.KA01-Q-4322. The said motorcycle allegedly dashed with an auto rickshaw bearing registration No. KA 18 A 6736. 5. The MACT and the High Court as well, have recorded a finding that the claimants have not proved involvement of the subject auto rickshaw in the accident. However, the appellant has placed before us additional documents in the nature of the order wherein the driver of the auto rickshaw admitted his guilt and upon such admission, the driver was convicted for committing offence under Sections- 279, 337 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. This order was passed on 22.11.2011 i.e, much before the Claim Petition was preferred by the claimants on 30.12.2014. 6. In our considered view, the order of conviction of the driver of the auto rickshaw involved in the subject accident, is an important piece of evidence which was not before the Courts below. 7. Therefore, in the interest of justice, the impugned order passed by the High Court and the MACT, are set aside and the appeal stands allowed. The matter is remitted back to the concerned MACT for de novo inquiry. Needless to say, both the parties would be at liberty to adduce evidence, both oral and documentary, afresh basing on the same pleadings which they have already submitted before the concerned MACT. 8. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.