Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Orissa · body

2026 DAILYLAW 7448 (ORI)

NIRUPAMA CHAMPATI v. STATE OF ODISHA

WP(C)/4777/2026 · 2026-04-23

Sashikanta Mishra

Writ Petition (Civil)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No. 4777 of 2026 Nirupama Champati …. Petitioner Represented by Mr. B. Rout, Advocate -Versus – State of Odisha &another …. Opp. Parties Represented by Mr. A.R. Dash, AGA CORAM: JUSTICE SASHIKANTA MISHRA ORDER_ 23.04.2026 1. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Addl. Government Advocate for the State. 3. This Court observes that the impugned order has been passed under Rule 42 of OSS Rules, 1962 read with paragraph-92 of the mutation manual 1962. This Court in the case of Asutosh Mohapatra & others vs. Sk. Manwar Alli & Others [W.P.(C) No. 24461 of 2026 & batch] has already held that order passed in mutation appeal can be revised by the Board of Revenue under Section 32 of OSS Act. 4. In such view of the matter, the writ petition is disposed of granting liberty to the petitioner to prefer revision within three Order No. 1. weeks before the appropriate revisional authority. If such revision is preferred, the same shall be considered in accordance with law. (Sashikanta Mishra) Judge BC.TUDU Designation: Sr. Stenographer