[2026:RJ-JP:21146] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5458/2026 Dinesh S/o Mahendra Singh, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Village Bhapar, P.s. Surajgarh, District Jhunjhunu (Raj.) (At Present The Accused Confined In District Jail, Jhunjhunu). ----Accused-Petitioner Versus The State of Rajsthan, through its Public Prosecutor ----Non-petitioner For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajesh Gadwal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Tapesh Agarwal, PP Mr. Mohit Goyal for Mr. Ashvin Garg HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SANGEETA SHARMA Order 19/05/2026 1. The instant bail application has been filed on behalf of the accused-petitioner under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. in connection with FIR No. 249/2024 registered at Police Station Surajgarh, District Jhunjhunu, for the offence(s) punishable under Section 124(1) of B.N.S., 2023. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. He also submits that the accused-petitioner is in custody since 30.01.2026. He further submits that charge-sheet has already been filed and the accused-petitioner has nothing to do with the alleged incident, conclusion of trial will take its own time, so no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the accused-petitioner [2026:RJ-JP:21146] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-5458/2026] in custody and therefore, prays that the accused-petitioner may be granted the benefit of bail under Section 483 of BNSS. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the submissions made by learned counsel for the accused-petitioner hereinabove and submits that there are allegations against the accused-petitioner of committing serious offences under Section 118(2), 124(1), 351(2), 109(1) and 61(2) of B.N.S., 2023. It is further submitted that bail order of co- accused Khushboo Sharma has already been cancelled by the Co- ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 12.03.2025 in S.B. Criminal Bail Cancellation Application No. 143/2024, therefore the accused-petitioner may not be granted the benefit of bail under Section 483 of BNSS. 4. Considering overall facts and circumstances of the case, the material made available before the Court in the form of charge- sheet and the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the parties; that after investigation serious offences under Section 118(2), 124(1), 351(2), 109(1) and 61(2) of B.N.S., 2023 have been found to be proved against the accused-petitioner. There are allegations on co-accused Khushboo Sharma of voluntarily causing grievous hurt to victim Arun by throwing acid on his face with the intention of causing permanent disformity/grievous hurt. The accused-petitioner has conspired with co-accused Khushboo Sharma by aiding and facilitating the alleged offence of acid attack by procuring the acid bottle. There are call details on record showing that since 08.07.2024 to 17.08.2024 (the fateful day of committing acid attack) co-accused Khushboo Sharma and the accused-petitioner were in constant contact with each other on [2026:RJ-JP:21146] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-5458/2026] mobile phone and there call duration is up to 375 seconds. After taking into consideration the gravity and seriousness of the offences, the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 12.03.2025, has already cancelled the bail order granted to co- accused Khushboo Sharma by the Trial Court. Injured Arun has sustained facial dis-figuration, vision loss and bodily burn up to 36 per cent and the injuries sustained by the injured have been opined to be dangerous to life in nature, therefore at this stage, without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, this Court is not inclined to extend the benefit of bail to the accused-petitioner under Section 483 BNSS at this stage. 5. Accordingly, the present criminal misc. bail application is dismissed. 6. The observation made hereinabove is only for decision of the instant bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. (SANGEETA SHARMA),J PUNEET KUMAR/29