Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 7446 (PAT)

Uday Ram @ Uday Kumar Ram v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./19491/2026 · 2026-04-29

Praveen Kumar

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.19491 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-154 Year-2025 Thana- LACHHUAR District- Jamui ====================================================== Uday Ram @ Uday Kumar Ram S/o Banars Ram @ Banarsi Ram R/o Village - Hariharpur, P.S - Lachhuar, District - Jamui ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Ashok Kumar Mishra, Adv For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Surendra Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEEN KUMAR ORAL ORDER 3 29-04-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. 2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Lachhuar (Lachchuar) P.S. Case No. 154 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 117(2), 109(1), 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the B.N.S. 3. As per prosecution case, this petitioner is alleged to have assaulted the son of informant, namely Rahul Kumar, with sharp edged weapon and stick on his head due to which he sustained head injury. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. The present case is counter-blast of Complaint Case No. 1128 of 2025 which was lodged against informant and others and only with a view to save their skin from the aforesaid Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.19491 of 2026(3) dt.29-04-2026 2/2 case, this false and concocted case has been lodged. Doctor has found the injuries, allegedly caused by this petitioner, simple in nature. It has further submitted that co-accused Ranjan Ram has been granted the privilege of anticipatory bail by the Co- ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 08.04.2026 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 19919 of 2026. Petitioner claims clean antecedents. 5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner. 6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the nature of allegation against the petitioner, let the above named petitioner, in the event of his arrest/surrender within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court concerned, in connection with Lachhuar (Lachchuar) P.S. Case No. 154 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the Bharitya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita (B.N.S.S.) 7. This application stands allowed. niku/- (Praveen Kumar, J) U T