IIFL FINANCE LIMITED v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS
WP(C)/2923/2026 · 2026-06-04
Kardak Ete
Writ Petition (Civil)body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 7442 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 7442 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010106892026
2026:GAU-AS:7855
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/2923/2026 IIFL FINANCE LIMITED A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF THE COMPANIES ACT AND A NON-BANKING FINANCIAL COMPANY HEREIN AFTER CALLED TO AND REFERRED AS NBFC AS PER THE GUIDELINES OF RBI, AND HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT IIFL HOUSE, SUN INFOTECH PARK, ROAD NO. 16V, PLOT NO. B-23, THANE INDUSTRIAL AREA, WAGLE, ESTATE, THANE- 400604, AND CORPORATE OFFICE AT 802, 8TH FLOOR, HUB TOWN, SOLARIS, N.S. PHANDKE MARG, VIJAY NAGAR, ANDHERI WEST,, MUMBAI- 400069 AND REGIONAL OFFICE AT 8TH FLOOR, AC MARKET, 1, SHAKESPEARE SARANI, KOLKATA- 700071, AND HAVING ITS BBRANCH AT 1ST FLOOR, ETB HOUSE, 191, M.R.D. ROAD,, CHANDMARI, GUWAHATI- 781003, ASSAM AND DULY REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORIZED OFFICER NAMELY UDIT PRAKASH KAKATI, AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS, S/O- KHANINDRA KAKATI, BY OCCUPATION- SERVICE AT IIFL FINANCE LTD., SIX MILE BRANCH, 2ND FLOOR,, H. K. MARKET, CHACHAL ROAD, SIX MILE, GUWAHATI- 781006 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM, HOME DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-6.
2:THE OFFICE IN CHARGE DISPUR POLICE STATION DISTRICT- KAMRUP (M) ASSAM GUWAHATI-6.
3:NAYAN NATH S/O- BIJOY KUMAR NATH R/O- RUKMINIGAON
Page No.# 2/2 GHANAKANTA PATH GUWAHATI ASSAM PIN 781022.
4:ABARTA KUMAR NATH
SON OF RABIN CHANDRA NATH 95 GHARPARA CHUBURI TEZPUR ASSAM. PIN -784001 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR T H HAZARIKA, MR A RASHID Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM,
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE ORDER Date : 05-06-2026 Mr. M. Chetia, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Mr. T. H. Hazarika, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that he has an instruction to withdraw the present writ petition and accordingly prays for withdrawal of the same. Prayer is allowed. Accordingly, the writ petition stands closed on withdrawal.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant