K.NANJAPPA (DIED) N.SUBRAMANI v. THE STATE OF TAMIL NADU
REV.APPL/190/2024 · 2026-01-22
D Bharatha Chakravarthy, S M Subramaniam
Transfer Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 74412 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 74412 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
REV.APPL No. 190 of 2024 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 22-01-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S. M. SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY REV.APPL No. 190 of 2024 AND CMP NO. 14813 OF 2024 K.Nanjappa (died) N.Subramani ..Petitioner/ Appellant/Petitioner Vs
1. The State Of Tamil Nadu Rep. by the District Collector, Dharmapuri District, Dharmapuri
2. The Special Tahsildar (adw) Krishnagiri, Krishnagiri District
3. Venkatagiriyamma
4. Thimmakka
5. Venkatamma
6. Renuka
7. Ammaiya
8. Narasamma ..Respondent(s) -vs- https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
REV.APPL No. 190 of 2024 __________ Page2 of 4 Prayer: To review the order dated 20.03.2024 passed in WA No. 956 of 2024 and render justice. For Applicant: Mr.P.Mani For R1 & R2: Mr.T.Arun Kumar Addl. Govt. Pleader O R D E R (Order of the Court was made by D.Bharatha Chakravarthy J.)
Review Application has been filed to review the order dated 20.03.2024 passed in W.A.No.956 of 2024. 2. Learned counsel for the applicant would submit that the order suffers from an error on the face of record, since Section 4(3)(b) of the Tamil Nadu Acquisition of land for Harijan Welfare Schemes Act, 1978 has not been considered by the learned Single Judge, while passing the order, as no order was passed by the District Collector and the same was also overlooked by the Division Bench. 3. On perusal of the order that is sought to be reviewed, it can be seen that the appeal was rejected primarily on the ground that the Award proceedings were known to the appellant / review applicant herein and the review applicant chose not to appear and allowed the award to be passed on 23.03.2001. Belated challenge, after the acquisition proceedings is over and award was passed, cannot be https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
REV.APPL No. 190 of 2024 __________ Page3 of 4 entertained and the writ appeal was decided. Therefore, the argument of the learned counsel for the Review Applicant in the present Review Application will not have any effect to dislodge the finding given in the Writ Appeal. 4. Accordingly, finding no merits in the Review Application, the same stands dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. (S.M.S.,J.) (D.B.C.,J.) 22-01-2026 Index: Yes Speaking order Neutral Citation: No AR To:
1. The District Collector Dharmapuri District, Dharmapuri. 2. The Special Tahsildar (ADW), Krishnagiri, Krishnagiri District.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
REV.APPL No. 190 of 2024 __________ Page4 of 4 S.M.SUBRAMANIAM J. AND D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY J. AR REV.APPL No. 190 of 2024 AND CMP NO. 14813 OF 2024 22-01-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis