Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 7441 (UTT)

PARVEZ ALAM v. DISTRICT MAGISTRATE HARIDWAR

WPSS/1628/2026 · 2026-07-01

Pankaj Purohit

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

UKHC010108152026 2026:UHC:5221 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WPSS/1628/2026 Parvez Alam --Petitioner Versus District Magistrate Haridwar --Respondent Hon'ble Pankaj Purohit, J. Ms. Sukhwani Singh, learned Counsel i/b Mr. Parikshit Saini, learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. Mr. Narain Dutt, learned S.C. for the State. 3. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of subsequent developments, the writ petition has rendered infructuous. She prays this matter to be dismissed as such. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. (Pankaj Purohit, J.) 01.07.2026 R.Dang