Uma Shankar Nishad @ Chotu Chaudhary @ Arya Choudhary v. The State of Bihar
CR. MISC./5725/2026 · 2026-03-11
R P Mishra
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 7441 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 7441 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.5725 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-291 Year-2025 Thana- SHIVSAGAR District- Rohtas ====================================================== Uma Shankar Nishad @ Chotu Chaudhary @ Arya Choudhary S/o Munna Chaudhary @ Munna chaudhary nishad R/o Village - Mohania,Malah toli, Ward No. 6, P.S - Mohania, District - Kaimur ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Priya Ranjan, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Vinod Shanker Modi, APP ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 4 11-03-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Shiv Sagar P.S. Case No. 291 of 2025, instituted for the offences punishable under Sections 8(c), 21(b), 22, 27(A) and 29 of the NDPS Act.
3. Prosecution allegation, in short, is that there is recovery of 42 gram of heroine like substance in this case and the petitioner along with other co-accused person has been arrested on spot.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. No incriminating material has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. Learned counsel for
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.5725 of 2026(4) dt.11-03-2026 2/3 the petitioner also submitted that the petitioner has got no concern with the alleged recovery of heroine. The alleged recovery has been made from the possession of co-accused Vishal Kumar. The recovered contraband is below the commercial quantity. Hence, Section 37 of the N.D.P.S. Act is not applicable in the present case. The petitioner is in custody since 26.10.2025 and has got two criminal antecedents. There is no compliance of Sections 42 and 50 of the N.D.P.S. Act.
Learned counsel for the petitioner further submitted that other co-accused person has been granted regular bail by this Court vide order dated 20.02.2026 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 88613 of
2025.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, the recovered contraband being below the commercial quantity and the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.
7. Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Shiv Sagar P.S. Case
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.5725 of 2026(4) dt.11-03-2026 3/3 No. 291 of 2025, subject to the following conditions: (I) One of the bailors shall be own/close member of the family of the petitioner. (II) The petitioner shall appear on each and every date fixed at the trial. In case of default in such appearance on two consecutive dates, the Trial Court will have liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner.
Raj Kishore/- (Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) U T