(2026:JHHC:12618) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 3591 of 2026 1. Jitendra Rajwar @ Jeetan Kapardar, aged about 25 years, son of Jagdish Rajwar. 2. Mahesh Rajwar @ Mahesh Kapardar, aged about 20 years, son of Marwari Rajwar. 3. Banti Rajwar @ Banti Kapardar, aged about 25 years, son of Ganga Rajwar @ Ganga Kapardar. 4. Kishun Rajwar, aged about 27 years, son of Tara Rajwar. 5. Manoj Rajwar, aged about 27 years, son of Dwarika Rajwar. 6. Dharmendra Rajwar, aged about 26 years, so of Dharni Rajwar. (All are residents of village – Mochro, PO – Ponda, PS – Kasmar, District – Bokaro). … … …Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand. … … …Opp. Party ------ For the Petitioner : Ms. Pinki Kumari, Advocate For the State : Ms. Sushma Aind, Addl. P.P. ------ HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ Order No:- 03, Dated:- 29th April, 2026 Heard the parties. The petitioners have moved before this Court for grant of bail in connection with Kasmar P.S. Case No. 08 of 2026 registered for the offences punishable under sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 115(2), 109, 132, 324(5), 292, 296, 351 and 352 of the B.N.S, 2023. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the allegation against the petitioners is that the petitioners, in furtherance of common intention with co-accused persons attempted to murder of the Police Personnel. It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioners are all false and the petitioners have no criminal antecedent as has been mentioned in paragraph no. 18 of the bail application. It is then submitted that the petitioners have been in custody since 03.02.2026, as has been mentioned in paragraph no. 19 of the bail application. It is further submitted that the genesis of dispute is a petty dispute regarding playing DJ at high volume during immersion of idol of goddess Saraswati. It is next submitted that the petitioners undertake to cooperate with the trial of the case and further undertakes that they will not annoy or disturb the informant or the witnesses or victims of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioners be admitted to bail. The learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am inclined to enlarge the abovenamed petitioners on bail. Accordingly, the petitioners are directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate – 1st Class, Bermo at Tenughat, in connection with Kasmar P.S. Case No. 08 of 2026, with the condition that the petitioners shall cooperate with the trial of the case and will furnish their mobile number and a copy of his Aadhar Card in the court below with the undertaking that they shall not change their mobile number during the trial of the case, with further condition that they shall not annoy or disturb the informant or the witnesses or the victims of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Aditi