Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 74248 (MAD)

MEENAKSHI v. CHELLAMMAL

CS/364/2019 · 2026-02-10

R N Manjula

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CS No. 364 of 2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 10-02-2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE R.N.MANJULA CS No. 364 of 2019 1. Meenakshi No.45-A, Kathbada 4th Lane, Old Washermanpet, Chennai 21 2. Parameswari No.45-A, Kathbada 4th Lane, Old Washermanpet, Chennai 21 3. L. Baskar No.45-A, Kathbada 4th Lane, Old Washermanpet, Chennai 21 4. Bhavani No.8, Dr. Subbarayan Nagar, Vedammal Avenue, Samiyarmadam, Kodambakkam, Ch 24 5. Dakshayani No.4, 10th Street, Ashok Nagar, Ch 83 Plaintiff(s) Vs 1. Chellammal No.8, Dr. Subbarayan Nagar, Vedammal Avenue, Samiyarmadam, Kodambakkam, Chennai 24 2.Muthukrishnan No.8, Dr. Subbarayan Nagar, Vedammal Avenue, Samiyarmadam, Kodambakkam, Chennai 24 3.Rajeswari No.8, Dr. Subbarayan Nagar, Vedammal Avenue, Samiyarmadam, https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CS No. 364 of 2019 Kodambakkam, Chennai 24 4.Narasimman No.8, Dr. Subbarayan Nagar, Vedammal Avenue, Samiyarmadam, Kodambakkam, Chennai 24 5.Veerasamy at Chinnathambi No.8, Dr. Subbarayan Nagar, Vedammal Avenue, Samiyarmadam, Kodambakkam, Chennai 24 6.Subramani No.8, Dr. Subbarayan Nagar, Vedammal Avenue, Samiyarmadam, Kodambakkam, Chennai 24 7.V. Perumal (DECEASED) No.45, Kathbada 4th Street, Old Washermanpet, h 21 8.Mrs. P.Kala W/o. Late Perumal 9.P. Gomathi D/o. Late Perumal. 10.P. Varalakshmi D/O. LATE PERUMAL. RESPONDENT 8 TO 10 ALL ARE RESIDING AT NO.45, KATHBADA 4TH LANE, OLD WASHERMANPET, CHENNAI-600 021. (Defendants 8 to 10 are brought on record as legal heirs of deceased 7th Defendant V. Perumal as per order dt. 04.09.2023 in Appl. No.s 4102 to 4104/2023 and time extended as per order dt. 19.09.2023). Defendant(s) https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CS No. 364 of 2019 CS No. 364 of 2019 PRAYER: Civil Suit is filed under Order VII Rule 1 CPC: (a) to grant a preliminary Decree of Partition of the Property more fully described in the schedule to this plaint by metes and bounds into 3 equal shares and allotment of 1/3rd share thereof to the plaintiff herein along with seperate possession; (b) to grant a permanent injunction restraining the defendants herein, their men, agents, servants or any one claiming through them from in any manner disturbing the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the suit property by the plaintiff; (c) to grant a permanent injunction restraining the defendants herein, their men, agents, servants or any one claiming through them from letting out, mortgaging, selling or in any other manner alienating the suit properties; (d) to grant such other relief. For Plaintiff(s): No appearance For Defendant(s): M/s.K.V.Sundararajan For D1 To D3, D5 And D6 - D7 Set Ex-parte On 27/11/2014 JUDGMENT When the matter was called on 02.02.2026, there was no representation for the plaintiff. Hence this Court ordered the matter to be listed under the caption “For dismissal” on 10.02.2026. Despite the matter has been listed under the caption “For dismissal”, even today, there is no representation for the plaintiff. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CS No. 364 of 2019 2. Hence, the Civil Suit is dismissed for default. No costs. 10-02-2026 Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes Neutral Citation:Yes/No bkn https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CS No. 364 of 2019 R.N.MANJULA J. bkn CS No. 364 of 2019 10-02-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis