Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 7422 (RAJ)

PREMRAJ ALIAS PREMO S/O RAMPHOOL v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/5979/2026 · 2026-05-20

Praveer Bhatnagar

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:21301] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5979/2026 Premraj Alias Premo S/o Ramphool, Aged About 42 Years, R/o Pipalwada, Police Bonli, At Present Vinayak Nagar, Ambedkar Khairda, Police Station Mantown, District Sawai Madhopur. (Presently Accused In Judicial Custody At District Jail Sawai Madhopur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Matalli Bhadu, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Chaudhary, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR Order 20/05/2026 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-petitioner. The accused-petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No.98/2025, registered at Police Station Mahila Thana (Sawai Madhopur), District Sawai Madhopur, for the offence(s) under Section 108 of BNS. 2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. It is also contended that there is no substantive evidence available on record to show that soon before the death of the deceased, the petitioner abetted the deceased to commit suicide; no suicide note was left and no bodily injury was found on the deceased’s body to have been caused by the petitioner. The deceased consumed poison and committed suicide merely because the petitioner [2026:RJ-JP:21301] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-5979/2026] scolded her and the same cannot fall within the ambit of abetment to suicide. It is further contended that the accused-petitioner is in custody since long, there are no criminal antecedents against the accused-petitioner and the trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, the bail application of the accused-petitioner may be allowed. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. 4. Heard and perused the material available on record. 5. Considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner and without commenting anything on the merits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail. 6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner- Premraj Alias Premo S/o Ramphool, in connection with FIR No.98/2025, registered at Police Station Mahila Thana (Sawai Madhopur), District Sawai Madhopur, shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J Ashwani Kr Srivastava/-25