SINGAMPALLI SURYANARAYANA v. DR. MALLIKARJUNA,I.A.S
CC/5073/2022 · 2026-08-13
Battu Devanand
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 7421 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 7421 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010610212022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE 14th DAY OF AUGUST 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND CONTEMPT CASE NO: 5073 OF 2022 Between:
1. SINGAMPALLI SURYANARAYANA, S/o.late Sunny, Aged 52 years, R/o.Mallunaidu Palem Village, Sabbavaram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
2. Singampalli Gangunaidu,, S/o.late Sunny, Aged 50 years, R/o.Mallunaidu Palem Village, Sabbavaram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
3. Singampalli Srinu,, S/o.late Sunny, Aged 45 years, R/o.Mallunaidu Palem Village, Sabbavaram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. ...Petitioners AND
1. DR MALLIKARJUNA I A S, , District Collector, (Panchayat Wing), Visakhapatnam District.
2. Sri Appala Raju, Divisional Panchayat Officer, Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam District.
3. Vennela Manasa, Panchayat Secretary, Mallunaidu Palem Gram Panchayat, Sabbavaram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. ...Respondents Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the respondents herein for willful disobedience of the order dated 04- 08-2021 in IA.No.1 of 2021 in WP.No.15703 of 2021 passed by this Hon'ble Court and pass
2
Counsel for the Petitioners: P DURGA PRASAD Counsel for the Respondents: KOTI REDDY IDAMAKANTI Counsel for the Respondents:KIRAN KUMAR VADLAMUDI The Court made the following order:
3
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND CONTEMPT CASE NO: 5073 OF 2022
ORDER:
This Contempt Case is filed against the respondents for wilful disobedience of the order in I.A.No.1 of 2021, dated 04.08.2021 passed by this Court in W.P.No.15703 of 2021.
2. During the course of hearing today, learned counsel appearing for the respondents, on instructions, would submit that the order of the Court is complied with.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioners also endorsed the same.
4. In view of the above factual position, in our considered view, no further adjudication is required in this case.
5. Accordingly, the Contempt Case is closed.
6. No order as to costs. Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in the Contempt Case shall stand closed.
_____________________________
JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND Date: 14.08.2026 PKR
4
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND
93
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 5073 OF 2022
Date: 14.08.2026 PKR