Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 7417 (UTT)

HIMANSHU ARYA v. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE DISTRICT ELECTION OFFICER

WPSS/1579/2026 · 2026-07-01

Pankaj Purohit

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

UKHC010104742026 2026:UHC:5210 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WPSS/1579/2026 Himanshu Arya --Petitioner Versus The District Magistrate District Election Officer --Respondent Hon'ble Pankaj Purohit, J. Mr. Harendra Belwal, learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. Mr. Sushil Vashisth, learned Standing Counsel for the State. 3. Mr. Sanjay Bhatt, learned counsel for respondent no.2. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner made a statement at bar that he wants to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to file fresh. 5. The prayer, so made, is granted. 6. The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. (Pankaj Purohit, J.) 01-07-2026 AK UKHC010104742026 2026:UHC:5210