Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 7409 (MAD)

Senthamizh valavan v. State by

CRL OP/5703/2026 · 2026-03-05

C Kumarappan

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRL OP No. 5703 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 05-03-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN CRL OP No. 5703 of 2026 Senthamizh valavan S/o.Ganesan, Amman Kovil Street, Seplanatham North, Viruthachalam Taluk, Cuddalore District-607 802. ..Petitioner(s) Vs State represented by: The Inspector of Police, Mandharakuppam Police Station, Cuddalore District. Cr.No.28/2026. ..Respondent(s) PRAYER: This Criminal Original Petition has been filed under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. praying to enlarge the petitioner on bail pending investigation in Cr.No.28/2026, on the file of the Mandharakuppam Police Station, Cuddalore District. For Petitioner(s): Ms. R.Swetha For Respondent(s): Mr. S. Vinoth Kumar, Government Advocate (Criminal side). ORDER The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 10.02.2026 for the alleged offences under Sections 296(b), 115(2), 118(1), https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 5703 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 329(4), 351(3) and 109 of B.N.S. in Crime No.28 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail. 2. The case of the prosecution is that on 09.02.2026 at about 8 pm., the petitioner picked wordy quarrel with the defacto complainant and assaulted him with deadly weapon. Hence, this case. 3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is an innocent, that according to the prosecution, the petitioner attacked the victim with deadly weapon, due to which, the victim sustained injury. The injured person was discharged from the hospital. He would further submit that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. Therefore, he prays to enlarge the petitioner on bail. 4. Whereas the learned Government Advocate (Criminal side) appearing for the respondent police strongly opposed to enlarge the petitioner on bail on the sole ground that the petitioner has 5 other previous cases and investigation is still pending. He further submits that the prosecution requires the petitioner for completing the investigation and if the petitioner is enlarged on bail, there is every possibility for tampering of witnesses. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 5703 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 5. While looking at the very submission made by the learned Government Advocate that investigation is still pending as the petitioner is under judicial custody only from 10.02.2026. this Court is of the opinion that it is not desirable to enlarge the petitioner on bail at this point of time. 6. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. 05-03-2026 MJS Note: 1. Registry is directed to forthwith upload this order in the Official Website of this Court. 2. All concerned to act on this order being uploaded in Official Website of this Court without insisting on certified hard copies. To be noted, this order when uploaded in the official website of this Court will be watermarked and will also have a QR code. To 1. The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras. 2. The Inspector of Police, Mandharakuppam Police Station, Cuddalore District. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 5703 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 C.KUMARAPPAN, J. MJS CRL OP No. 5703 of 2026 05-03-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis