RAVI KUMAR ALIAS RAVI KUMAR THAKUR v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./1339/2026 · 2026-04-30
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 7409 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 7409 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
( 2026:JHHC:12825 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No.1339 of 2026
------ Ravi Kumar @ Ravi Kumar Thakur aged about 32 years, S/o Rajesh Kumar Thakur R/o Village-Bar Jhopri, Jagarnathpur, Dhurwa, P.O. & P.S.-Dhurwa, District-Ranchi (Jharkhand).
.... .... …. Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand
.... .... .... Opposite Party
------
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Mr. K.S. Nanda, Advocate
: Ms. Shreya Tiwary, Advocate
For the State
: Mr. Someshwar Roy, Addl.P.P
------
Order No.03 Dated- 30-04-2026
Heard the parties. The petitioner has moved this Court for grant of bail in connection with Ratu P.S. Case No.121 of 2020 corresponding to G.R. Case No.1403 of 2020 registered for the offences punishable under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code & Section 27 & 28 of Arms Act. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner committed robbery and looted the motorcycle of the informant at the point of pistol. It is next submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false. It is then submitted that the petitioner is not named in the FIR. It is also submitted that without putting the petitioner on T.I.P. as mentioned in para-12 of this bail application, the charge sheet has been submitted against the petitioner. It is further submitted that the petitioner undertakes to cooperate with the trial of the case and further undertakes that he will not annoy or disturb the informant/victim or the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 14.09.2025 as is evident from para- 01 of this bail application. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be admitted to bail. The learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as
discussed above, I am inclined to enlarge the above-named petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, Ranchi in connection with Ratu P.S. Case No.121 of 2020 corresponding to G.R. Case No.1403 of 2020 with the condition that the petitioner will co-operate with the trial of the case and will furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case, with further condition that he will not annoy or disturb the informant or the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) 30/04/2026 Abhiraj/