JIYARUDDIN SHEKH ALIAS JIYARUDDIN SK v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./2433/2026 · 2026-04-29
Anubha Rawat Choudhary
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 7406 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 7406 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
( 2026:JHHC:12659 )
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 2433 of 2026
Jiyaruddin Shekh @ Jiyaruddin Sk. Son of Sharif Shekh
… … Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand
…
… Opp. Party ---
CORAM :HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY ---
For the Petitioner : Mr. Shailesh Kumar Singh, Advocate
For the Opp. Party : Mr. Shailesh Kumar Sinha, A.P.P.
---
03/29.04.2026 Heard the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 11.01.2026 in connection with Nirsa P.S. Case No. 21 of 2026, for the offences registered under Sections 69/3(5) of the B.N.S. 2023, pending in the court of learned J.M. 1st Class, Dhanbad.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that on the face of the FIR it has been stated that the victim had love affair with the petitioner and at one point of time the petitioner also tried to consume poison so that he could get married with the victim. He has further submitted that it is alleged that the victim was raped on the pretext of marriage and ultimately the marriage did not materialize and then the FIR was instituted. The petitioner is 20 years of age and as per the FIR, the victim is 19 years of age.
4.
Learned counsel for the opposite party-State has opposed the prayer and has submitted that there is direct allegation against the petitioner. However, the aforesaid submission which have been made on the basis of the allegation in the FIR itself is not in dispute. He submits that the petitioner has criminal antecedent of the year 2020.
5. To this, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was granted bail in the earlier case by the learned trial court itself.
6. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and considering the aforesaid submissions and as is admitted from the FIR itself that there was lover affair between the petitioner and the victim and the petitioner is in custody since 11.01.2026 and charge sheet has
( 2026:JHHC:12659 )
2
already been submitted, the petitioner above named is directed to be enlarged on bail on his furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rs. Twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned J.M. 1st Class, Dhanbad, in connection with Nirsa P.S. Case No. 21 of 2026, on the following conditions: (i) One of the bailors would be the present pairvikar of the petitioner. (ii) The other bailor should be his close relative. (iii) The petitioner will attend the court on each and every date and on account of his single default, the learned court shall cancel the bail bond furnished by the petitioner. (iv) The petitioner will deposit a self-attested copy of his Aadhar Card along with his mobile number before the learned court which he will not change during the pendency of the case without prior permission of the court. (v) The petitioner shall fully co-operate with the proceedings before the learned court below.
7. Let this order along with a copy of the affidavit filed with the bail petition be communicated to the court concerned through FAX/e- mail.
8. The instant bail application is allowed with the aforesaid conditions.
(Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) Dated: 29.04.2026 Uploaded on: 30.04.2026 Binit/