BHAHM DEV v. UTTARAKHAND PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION
WPSS/1178/2026 · 2026-06-30
Manoj Kumar Tiwari
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 7405 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 7405 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
UKHC010072232026
2026:UHC:5194 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
WPSS/1178/2026
Bhahm Dev --Petitioner Versus Uttarakhand Public Service Commission --Respondent
Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J
1. Mr. Abhijay Negi, learned counsel for the petitioner.
2. Mr. Pankaj Miglani, learned counsel for the respondent-Selecting Body.
3. By means of this writ petition, petitioners have sought the following reliefs:-
(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari to quash the impugned detailed amendment dated 26.10.2024 (Annexure 3; page 50 to 52), read with the amendment carried out in the certiorari on 16.09.2025 (Annexure 5; page 56 to 57), and as being contrary to the terms of the advertisement dated 18.07.2024 (Annexure 2; page 25 to 49), and tantamount to changing the rules of the game midway through the selecting process.
(ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondent Uttarakhand Public Service Commission to act upon the advertisement as released on 18.07.2024, for the post of Additional Private Secretary, for 103 vacancies as per the terms of the advertisement dated 18.07.2024, and the elaborate pre determined marking pattern of the first round be followed and factored in preparing the final merit. (Annexure 2; page 25 to 49).
4. Mr. Pankaj Miglani, learned counsel
UKHC010072232026
2026:UHC:5194 for the Selecting Body submits that identical issue was dealt with by coordinate Bench in WPSS No. 1585 of
2026. He thus submits that the writ petition deserves to be decided in terms of the said judgment.
5. Upon perusal of the judgment, relied upon by learned counsel for the respondent, this Court finds that issue involved is identical.
6. In such view of the matter, the present writ petition is decided in terms of judgment dated 17.06.2026 rendered in WPSS No. 1585 of 2026.
(Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J)
30.06.2026 Aswal
NITI RAJ SINGH ASWAL Digitally signed by NITI RAJ SINGH ASWAL DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=eacc6757ee7881e933ff8934f07477005aa8 5f9802a3a08b08d1369512ea30f3, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=44EB54CBF00B7698CB6F10C2CE3D2 6F5C22DACF4F4610C1FE58A58531726FBB0, cn=NITI RAJ SINGH ASWAL Date: 2026.06.30 06:00:46 -07'00'