2026:HHC:7313 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 3047 of 2026 Decided on: 16.03.2026 Mamta Rani …….Petitioner Versus The State of Himachal Pradesh and others … Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 _____________________________________________________ For the petitioner : Ms. Oshin Anand Chauhan, Advocate as Proxy Counsel. For the respondents : Mr. Rajat Chauhan, Assistant Advocate General for respondents – State. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) Notice. Mr. Rajat Chauhan, learned Assistant Advocate General, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. 2. By way of this writ petition, the petitioner has approached this Court with the prayer that in light of the fact that the petitioner is a class-IV employee and the age of superannuation of class-IV employees in the State is 60 years, therefore, she be allowed to serve the respondent-Department till the age of 60 years. 3. Learned Assistant Advocate General submits that this issue is pending before Hon’ble Supreme Court of India. 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 2026:HHC:7313 4. Accordingly, as agreed, this petition is disposed of with the direction that the parties shall abide by the judgment passed by Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in Satya Devi’s case. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of accordingly. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge March 16, 2026 (narender)