Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 7399 (RAJ)

MUSTAK S/O IBRAHIM v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/8786/2026 · 2026-05-15

Sameer Jain

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:20585] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 8786/2026 1. Mustak S/o Ibrahim, Aged About 49 Years, R/o Silkhoh (59), Tauru, District Mewat, Haryana, Registered Owner Of Vehicle Registration No. Hr 74 B 0529 2. Aabid Hussain S/o Abdul Gani, R/o Village Chharora, Tehsil Taoru, Nuh, Mewat, Haryana, Registered Owner Of Vehicle Registration No. Hr 74 A 4629 3. Neha Enterprises, Prop. Mohammad Aslam Khan, G M Bad Pali (13), Faridabad, Haryana Through Proprietor Mohammad Aslam Khan S/o Iblay Husan, R/o Flat No. 208, Tower B2, Sector 4, Ummed Garden, Greater Noida West, Shah Beri, Gautam Buddha Nagar, Uttar Pradesh, Registered Owner Of Vehicle Registration No. Hr 38 Ad 0024 ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Transport Department Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan, Through Secretary. 2. Department Of Mining And Geology, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan, Through Joint Secretary. 3. Commissioner, Transport Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur. 4. Regional Transport Officer, Rto Office Jaipur First, District Jaipur (Rajasthan). 5. District Transport Officer, Dto Office Kotputli, District Kotputl-Behror (Rajasthan). 6. Regional Transport Officer, Rto Office Alwar, District Alwar (Rajasthan). 7. Regional Transport Officer, Rto Office Bharatpur, District Bharatpur (Rajasthan). 8. Regional Transport Officer, Rto Office Sikar, District Sikar (Rajasthan). 9. District Transport Officer, Dto Office Dausa, District Dausa (Rajasthan). 10. District Transport Officer, Dto Office Jhunjhunu, District [2026:RJ-JP:20585] (2 of 2) [CW-8786/2026] Jhunjhunu (Rajasthan). ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Rajani Vyas For Respondent(s) : Mr. S.S. Naruka, AAG with Ms. Ritika Nanda HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Order 15/05/2026 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the instant lis is no more res integra, and is already addressed by the ratio encapsulated in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.6034/2026 titled Dayanand Bharia and Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. decided vide judgment dated 02.04.2026. 2. Mr. S.S. Naruka has not disputed the said fact. 3. Accordingly, the present writ petition is disposed of in light of the ratio of Dayanand Bharia (supra) and Lakhpat & Ors. V. State of Rajasthan: S.B.CWPNo.5692/2026, which shall be squarely applicable to the instant petition. The petitioners are directed to mark their attendance on 25.05.2026 at or around 11:00 AM before the competent/appropriate authority. It is directed that the said authority shall pass a speaking order, strictly in accordance with law, within an upper limit of 15 days from the date of petitioners being present. 4. Pending applications, if any, shall stand disposed of. (SAMEER JAIN),J CHANDAN /16