Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 73939 (MAD)

T.Raja Kumar v. Securities and Exchange Board of India

WP/14099/2021 · 2026-02-09

Anita Sumanth, Mummineni Sudheer Kumar

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:MHC:553 WP No. 14099 of 2021 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 09-02-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR WP No. 14099 of 2021 T.Raja Kumar S/o. S. Thangavel No. 2 / 182 Raja Garden 1st street Kottivakkam Chennai 600041 ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. Securities and Exchange Board of India Represented by its Chairman SEBI Bhavan BKS Plot No. C4 - A, G Block Bandra Kurla complex, Bandra (East) Mumbai 400 051 2. Tamil Nadu Mercantile Bank Limited Represented by its Managing director No. 57, V.E.Road Tuticorin 628 002 ..Respondent(s) PETITION filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of Writ of Mandamus to direct the first respondent to consider the complaint / representation dated 22.03.2021, 19.05.2021, and 02.06.2021 for stopping the issuance of public offer (IPO) by the second respondent bank until the completion of the proceedings against the second respondent initiated by the enforcement directorate and the investigation for violation of the FEMA and to return the draft documents of the public offer (IPO) For Petitioner(s): Mr. M.L.Ramesh https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 14099 of 2021 __________ Page2 of 4 For Respondent(s): Mr.Balamurali For M/s.Shivakumar and Suresh – R1 Mr.Harshit S. Jain for Rank Associates - R2 O R D E R (Order of the Court was made by Dr.Anita Sumanth J.) Mr.Ramesh, learned counsel appears today for the petitioner and apologises for the non-appearance on the earlier occasion. In any event, we had, vide our order dated 06.02.2026, recorded at paragraph 2 as follows: 2. Incidentally, both Mr.Harshit S.Jain, learned counsel for R2 and Mr.Balamurali Sivakumar, learned counsel for R1 point out that the matter is infructuous as the prayer was as against the proposed IPO by R2 Bank till completion of proceedings as against R2 by the Enforcement Directorate, despite which the IPO did take place on 15.09.2022. 2. Since the IPO has taken place on 15.09.2022, nothing survives in this Writ Petition and hence the same is dismissed as infructuous. Needless to say, it is open to the petitioner to avail any other remedy that is available, in accordance with law. No costs. (A.S.M.,J.) (M.S.K.,J.) 09-02-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes SL https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 14099 of 2021 __________ Page3 of 4 To 1. Securities and Exchange Board of India Represented by its Chairman SEBI Bhavan BKS Plot No. C4 - A, G Block Bandra Kurla complex, Bandra (East) Mumbai 400 051 2. Tamil Nadu Mercantile Bank Limited Represented by its Managing director No. 57, V.E.Road Tuticorin 628 002 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 14099 of 2021 __________ Page4 of 4 DR.ANITA SUMANTH J. AND MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR J. SL WP No. 14099 of 2021 09-02-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis