Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 7393 (HP)

NARENDER KUMAR v. THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS

EX.P./240/2026 · 2026-03-11

Ajay Mohan Goel

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Execution Petition No.240 of 2026 Decided on :30.04.2026 ____________________________________________________________ Narender Kumar ...Petitioner Versus State of HP and others ...Respondents _____________________________________________________________ Coram Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jiya Lal Bhardwaj, Judge Whether approved for reporting? 1 For the petitioner: Ms. Shivani Rana, Advocate, vice Ms. Shalini Thakur, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General with Mr. Rahul Thakur, Deputy Advocate General. Jiya Lal Bhardwaj , Judge (Oral) Learned Deputy Advocate General has produced a communication and office order dated 29.04.2026, issued by the Director, Elementary Education, Himachal Pradesh and Deputy Director, School Education (Elementary), District Sirmaur at Nahan, respectively. The same are taken on record. 2. A perusal of office order dated 29.04.2026 reveals that the petitioner was already promoted as Centre Head Teacher prior to 01.10.2012, and the matter 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 was taken up with Worthy Director of Elementary Education, H.P., who has clarified vide letter dated 10.10.2024, that benefit as envisaged in the judgment may not be extended to him. 3. Since this Court had only given the directions to the respondents to decide the representation, the competent authority has passed an office order on 29.04.2026, thus the mandate contained in the judgment dated 02.01.2025, in CWP No. 14904 of 2024, titled, Narender Kumar vs. State of Himachal Pradesh & others, has been duly complied with and nothing remains to be adjudicated in the present petition and the same is closed. However, the petitioner is at liberty to take appropriate recourse for challenging the order dated 29.04.2026, if available under law. 4. Accordingly, the execution petition is disposed of. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, also stand disposed of. 30 th April , 2026 ( Jiya Lal Bhardwaj ) (Anurag) Judge