2026:MHC:749 Review Appln. No.102 of 2022 ------------------------------------------- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 19.02.2026 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN Review Appln. No.102 of 2022 and 1.R.Karthikeyan 2.S.Soundararajan 3.R.Babu 4.R.Praveenkumar [Cause title accepted vide Court order dated 17.12.2021 made in C.M.P.No.8765 of 2020 in Rev.Appl.Sr.No.51951 of 2020] ...Petitioners Vs. 1.The Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Corporation Ltd., Rep. by its Chairman cum Managing Director, Secretariat Branch, N.P.K.K.R. Maligai, 144, Anna Salai, Chennai – 600 002. 2.The Chief Engineer (Personnel), The Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Corporation Ltd., Secretariat Branch, N.P.K.K.R. Maligai, 144, Anna Salai, Chennai – 600 002. ---------------- Page No.:1/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Review Appln. No.102 of 2022 ------------------------------------------- 3.The Chief Engineer, Mettur Thermal Power Project, Salem District. 4.The District Collector, Salem District, Salem. ...Respondents PRAYER : This Review Application has been filed under Order XLVII Rule 1 read with Section 114 of the Code of Civil Procedure, praying to review the judgment and order dated 24.08.2018 in Writ Appeal No.58 of 2018. For Petitioners : Mr.V.N.Subramaniam For Respondents : Mr.Venkatesh Prasad.AP for M/s. Advit Law Chambers for R1 to R3 Dr.S.Suriya, Addl. Govt. Pleader for R4 ******* O R D E R (Order of the Court was made by C.KUMARAPPAN, J.) The present Review Application has been filed against the order of this Court dated 24.08.2018, wherein, the respondents’ request for employment under the “land looser” category was rejected. ---------------- Page No.:2/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Review Appln. No.102 of 2022 ------------------------------------------- 2. Now, the review petitioner would submit that the writ appellate Court did not consider the rehabilitation Scheme, which was provided by the Authorities for job assistance. 3. The very submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner comes within the category of re-hearing the appeal, which cannot be done by this Court under the review jurisdiction. Only the error apparent alone can be considered. 4. This, in our view, is not an error apparent . Hence, the present Review Application stands dismissed. No costs. (S.M.S., J.) (C.K., J.) 19.02.2026 dsa Internet :Yes/No Index :Yes/No Neutral Citation :Yes/No ---------------- Page No.:3/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Review Appln. No.102 of 2022 ------------------------------------------- To: 1.The Chairman cum Managing Director, Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Corporation Ltd., Secretariat Branch, N.P.K.K.R. Maligai, 144, Anna Salai, Chennai – 600 002. 2.The Chief Engineer (Personnel), The Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Corporation Ltd., Secretariat Branch, N.P.K.K.R. Maligai, 144, Anna Salai, Chennai – 600 002. 3.The Chief Engineer, Mettur Thermal Power Project, Salem District. 4.The District Collector, Salem District, Salem. ---------------- Page No.:4/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Review Appln. No.102 of 2022 ------------------------------------------- S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J. and C.KUMARAPPAN, J. dsa Review Appln. No.102 of 2022 19.02.2026 ---------------- Page No.:5/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis