[2026:RJ-JP:20138] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 19207/2025 1. Lokesh Bairwa S/o Shri Radhey Shyam Bairwa, Aged About 26 Years, Resident Of Village Indawa, Post Lalsot, Tehsil Lalsot, Distt. Dausa (Raj.) 2. Rambabu Sharma S/o Shri Jagdish Prasad Sharma, Aged About 50 Years, Resident Of Village Nangal Urf Abheypura, Tehsil Lalsot, Distt. Dausa (Raj.) ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Additional Chief Secretary, Department Of Social Justice And Empowerment, Government Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.) 2. Director, Social Justice And Empowerment, Ambedkar Bhawan, G-3/a, Rajmahal Residence Area, Civil Lines Phatak, Jaipur (Raj.) 3. District Collector, Dausa (Raj.) 4. Surajmal Banjara S/o Sardar Banjara, Resident Of Village Nangal Urf Abheypura, Tehsil Lalsot, Distt. Dausa. (Raj.) 5. Hansa Banjara W/o Satish Banjara, Resident Of Village Nangal Urf Abheypura, Tehsil Lalsot, Distt. Dausa. (Raj.) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ashwinee Kumar Jaiman Mr. Keshav Parashar For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Order 13/05/2026 1. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that petitioners have filed a detailed representations (Annexure nos.-3 and 5) which were to be decided within a period of 60 days, as per the relevant provisions. However, on account of political pressure, [2026:RJ-JP:20138] (2 of 2) [CW-19207/2025] the same is not adjudicated by District Collector - Chairman of District Level Scrutiny Committee and the State Level Scrutiny Committee, as formulated in light of judgment reported in 1994 6 SCC 241 titled Kumari Madhuri Patil V/s. Additional Commissioner Tribal Development. 2. Learned counsel has submitted that non-redressal of the grievance in timely manner is effecting the rights of the petitioner and community at large. 3. Considering the facts of the case, this Court directs that representations (Annexure nos.-3 and 5) be decided by District Collector- Chairman of District Level Committee, within a period of thirty days in light of the ratio encapsulated in Pawan Meena vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. registered as (SBCWP No. 1665/2024; Neutral Citation: 2024:RJ-JP:5792) and circular (No. i- 10¼1½ izlq-@vuqq-&1@2012) dated 19.02.2024 passed by Chief Secretary, Rajasthan, in accordance with law by way of a speaking order. 4. Accordingly, the present writ petition is disposed of. Pending applications, if any, shall stand disposed. (SAMEER JAIN),J DEEPAK /27