Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 739 (RAJ)

ALFAJ URF AFFA S/O SHRI TAIYAB v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/1115/2026 · 2026-03-17

Sameer Jain

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:11255] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 1115/2026 Alfaj Urf Affa S/o Shri Taiyab, Aged About 21 Years, R/o Ghatmika, Police Station Pahadi, District Deeg (Raj.) (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Central Jail Alwar). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Jiya UR Rahman For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Sharma, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Order 17/03/2026 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-applicant. The accused-applicant was arrested in connection with FIR No. 06/2026 registered at Police Station Sadar Alwar District Alwar for the offence(s) under Sections 112(2), 238(B), 316(2), 318(4), 319(2), 336(3), 340(2), 61(2) of BNS and Section 66C, 66D of the IT Act. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-applicant submits that the applicant is a young man aged 21 years. It is submitted that the applicant is in custody ever since 02.01.2026 and charge- sheet has been filed. It is further submitted that recoveries have been made, including of Mobile Phone. It is also submitted that as per charge-sheet, there are no criminal antecedents registered against the applicant. Learned counsel further submits that the conclusion of trial is likely to take a long time and no useful [2026:RJ-JP:11255] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-1115/2026] purpose would be served by keeping the applicant behind bars till disposal of the case. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. 4. Having heard the arguments advanced by the learned counsel for the parties and considering the fact that accused- applicant is a young man of 21 years; that charge-sheet has been filed; that there are no criminal antecedents registered against the accused-applicant; that accused-applicant is in custody ever since 02.01.2026; that recoveries have been made including that of the mobile phone and looking to the overall facts and circumstances of the case and material on record but without commenting on merits/demerits of the case, this court is inclined to allow the bail application of the accused-applicant and enlarge him on bail. 5. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that accused-applicant Alfaj Urf Affa S/o Shri Taiyab, shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial Judge for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing as and when called upon to do so. (SAMEER JAIN),J Pooja /32