p. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.595 of 2026 1. Shaikh Mustaque Ahammad 2. Shaikh Nur Mahammad …. Petitioners Mr. A. K. Mohanty, Advocate -versus- 1. State of Odisha 2. Revenue Divisional Commissioner, Central Zone, Cuttack 3. The Collector, Cuttack 4. The Block Development Officer, Niali, Cuttack 5. The Tahasildar, Niai, Pattamundai, Cuttack 6. District Welfare Officer, Cuttack …. Opposite Parties Mr. S. K. Swain, AGA CORAM: JUSTICE V. NARASINGH Order No. ORDER 19.01.2026 01. 1. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and learned counsel for the State. 2. The grievance of the Petitioner in the present writ application is construction of a Multi-Proposal Community Centre. It is submitted by the learned p. 2 counsel that ventilating their grievance a representation has been submitted to the Collector- Opposite Party No.03 alleging inaction in the matter of consideration of such representation stated to have been submitted on 23.08.2025, the present Writ Petition has been filed. 3. It is apt to note here that the Petitioner Nos.1 and 2 are the representationist Nos.7 and 5. 4. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the State that the writ petition is premature. 5. Considering the rival submissions, this Court is of the considered view that interest of justice would be subserved if the Petitioners pursue the representation at Annexure-05. 6. Accordingly, the Writ Petition stands disposed of giving liberty to the Petitioners to pursue the representation. 7. It is needless to state here that this Court has not expressed any opinion regarding the merits of the claim. (V. NARASINGH) Judge Jina