Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 7389 (RAJ)

RAKESH GURJAR S/O SHRI HAJARI LAL GURJAR v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/6546/2026 · 2026-05-21

Praveer Bhatnagar

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:21584] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 6546/2026 1. Rakesh Gurjar S/o Shri Hajari Lal Gurjar, Aged About 24 Years, R/o Mavto Ki Dhani, Police Station Phulera (Rajasthan) (At Present Confined In Central Jail Jaipur). 2. Mahendra Gurjar S/o Shri Shyokaran Gurjar, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Mavto Ki Dhani, Police Station Phulera (Rajasthan) (At Present Confined In Central Jail Jaipur). ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mukesh Kumar Saini, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Sharma, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR Order 21/05/2026 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. on behalf of accused-petitioners. The accused- petitioners have been arrested in connection with FIR No.61/2025, registered at Police Station Mansarovar, District Jaipur City (South), for the offence(s) under Sections 109(1), 140(3) and 3(5) of B.N.S. and Section 27 of the Arms Act. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the accused- petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. It is contended that the recovery of firearm was affected from the other co-accused Bansilal, who has already been enlarged on bail by the trial Court vide order dated 20.02.2025 and the other [2026:RJ-JP:21584] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-6546/2026] similarly placed co-accused Suresh Gurjar has already been enlarged on bail by the Co-ordinate Bench vide order dated 18.06.2025 and the case of the petitioners are identical to the other co-accused Suresh Gurjar. It is further contended that the accused-petitioners are in custody since long and trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, the bail application of the accused-petitioners may be allowed. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the grant of bail application. 4. Heard and perused the material available on the record. 5. It is not desirable to express anything on the merits of the case, the main allegation of causing firearm injury is against Bansilal from whom the recovery of firearm was made and he has already been enlarged on bail by the trial Court and the other similarly placed co-accused Suresh Gurjar is also enlarged on bail by the Co-ordinate Bench vide order dated 18.06.2025, therefore, considering the aforesaid facts, this Court deems it proper to enlarge the accused-petitioners on bail. 6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioners namely; 1. Rakesh Gurjar S/o Shri Hajari Lal Gurjar and 2. Mahendra Gurjar S/o Shri Shyokaran Gurjar, in connection with FIR No.61/2025, registered at Police Station Mansarovar, District Jaipur City (South), shall be enlarged on bail provided both of them furnish a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for their appearance before the Court [2026:RJ-JP:21584] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-6546/2026] concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J Ashwani Kr Srivastava/Rameshwar/-38