Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 7388 (UTT)

VINOD KUMAR v. EXCISE COMMISSIONER STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPMS/2517/2023 · 2026-06-29

Manoj Kumar Tiwari

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

UKHC010144372023 2026:UHC:5137 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WPMS/2517/2023 Vinod Kumar --Petitioner Versus Excise Commissioner State Of Uttarakhand --Respondent Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J. Mr. Gaurav Singh, Advocate, holding brief of Mr. Saneep Kothari, Advocate for the petitioner. 2. Mr. Devendra Pant, Standing Counsel for the State of Uttarakhand. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner makes a statement at the bar that the writ petition has become infructuous by efflux of time. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. (Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.) 29.06.2026 Navin