Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 7388 (CHH)

THAKUR NARENDRA SINGH v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/2622/2026 · 2026-04-15

Shri Parth Prateem Sahu

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:17360 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 2622 of 2026 1 - Thakur Narendra Singh S/o Late Shri Jaanardan Singh Aged About 67 Years Electrician, R/o Madhaw Sadan, In Front Of Canara Bank, Hariom Hostel, Street No. 2, Tulshi Pur, Tahsil And Distt. Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner Versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary Department Of Revenue And Disaster Management, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Nava Raipur, Distt. Raipur, Chhattisgarh, Distt. Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2 - Director Printing And Stationery Directorate Block A, 2nd Floor, Indravati Bhawan, Mantralaya Nava Raipur, Distt. Raipur Chhattisgarh, Distt. Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 3 - Chhattisgarh Rajya Annusuchit Jati Ayog Through Secretary, Block 3, 3rd And 4th Floor, Indrawati Bhawan, Nava Raipur, Distt. Raipur, Chhattisgarh, Distt. Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 4 - Ravindra Gayakwad S/o Late Shri Vasudev Gayakwad Aged About 57 Years R/o C- 7, Galaxy Residency, Amlideeh, Raipur, Distt. Raipur, Chhattisgarh, Distt. Raipur, Chhattisgarh. ... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Ashok Patil, Advocate along with Ms. Seema Verma, Advocate For Respondents-State : Mr. Hariom Rai, Panel Lawyer SB: Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge ORDER ON BOARD 16 /04/2026 2 1. The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking following reliefs:- “10.1 That this Hon'ble court may kindly be pleased to issue an appropriate writ direction or order to quash the order dated 18.07.2019 passed by the Respondent No. 3 filed as Annexure P/2. 10.2 That, the Hon’ble Court may kindly be directed to the respondents authority to produce the service records of the Respondent No. 4 for verification and eligibility for the post of overseer. 10.3 Any other relief, which this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper according to the facts and circumstances of the case along with the cost of the petitioners.” 2. After arguing for sometime, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this writ petition at this stage with liberty to file appropriate proceedings. 3. In view of the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. 4. Certified copy as per rules. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge Dey SHUBHAM DEY Digitally signed by SHUBHAM DEY