NIRMALA MEENA W/O RAKESH KUMAR, D/O ANANDILAL MEENA v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CW/7032/2026 · 2026-05-13
Anand Sharma
Transfer Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 7387 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 7387 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:20225] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 7032/2026
1. Nirmala Meena W/o Rakesh Kumar, D/o Anandilal Meena, Aged About 46 Years, R/o 71/62 Pratap Nagar, Sanganer, Jaipur, At Present Posted As Female Supervisor Child Development Project Officer (Cdpo), Sanganer (Rural),
2. Anuradha Agarwal W/o Rajendra Agarwal, D/o Gangalehri Gupta, Aged About 42 Years, R/o Plot No. 8, Sachivalan Colony, Lane No. 9, Barkat Nagar, Tonk Phatak, Jaipur, At Present Posted As Female Supervisor Child Development Project Officer (Cdpo), Sanganer (Rural),
3. Sushila Bharia W/o Amit Abusaria, D/o Maliram Bhariya, Aged About 39 Years, R/o Plot No. 179, Flat No. 102, Radhika Apartment, Shree Ram Vihar, Jagatpura, Jaipur, At Present Posted As Female Supervisor Child Development Project Officer (Cdpo), Sanganer (Rural),
4. Sunita Saini W/o Ravi Shankar Mali, D/o Buddhi Prakash, Aged About 46 Years, R/o West Part Of 31, East Part Of 32, Girdhar Vatika, Near Pooja Haweli, Mohanpura Balaji Road, Sanganer, Jaipur, At Present Posted As Female Supervisor Child Development Project Officer (Cdpo), Sanganer City (Jaipur),
5. Mamta Meena W/o Late Kunjilal Meena, D/o Heeralal Meena, Aged About 44 Years, R/o 25 Pawan Vihar Colony, Jagatpura, Jaipur, At Present Posted As Female Supervisor Child Development Project Officer (Cdpo), Bassi ----Petitioners Versus
1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Women And Child Development Department, Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. The Director, Women And Child Development Department, Icds, Gandhi Nagar, Jaipur.
3. The Deputy Director (Administration), Icds, 2, Jal Path, Gandhi Nagar, Jaipur. ----Respondents
[2026:RJ-JP:20225] (2 of 3) [CW-7032/2026] For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Parth Sharma Mr. Rakesh Kumar Ms. Kirti Jain For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA
Order 13/05/2026
1. Petitioners have filed this writ petition with following prayers:-
"In view of the above cogent facts, law and circumstances of the case, it is most humbly prayed that the writ petition filed by the present petitioners may kindly be allowed and the respondent authority may kindly be directed to place the petitioners in running pay band of Rs. 9300-34800, with the grade pay of 4200 after completion of 10 years of service on the post of Lady Supervisor s per the provisions of RCS Revised Pay Rules, 2017, in terms of the judgment of the Hon'ble High Court dated 05.03.2010 and the judgment of the Hon'ble Apex Court dated 26.11.2013 supra with all consequential service benefits. And may pass any other order(s) which this Hon'ble Court deems just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case."
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioners, at the outset submits that the controversy involved in this writ petition has already been set at rest by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 05.03.2010 passed in a batch of writ petitions led by Civil Writ Petition No.2156/2007 (Smt. Manju Rani Nadheria & Ors. Vs. State & Ors.) and such order of Single Judge has also been examined and confirmed by the Division Bench.
[2026:RJ-JP:20225] (3 of 3) [CW-7032/2026]
3.
Learned counsel submits that in the aforesaid circumstances, the petitioners may also be given liberty to submit a representation in the light of aforesaid order passed by the Co- ordinate Bench of this Court, so that their grievance may also be redressed by the respondents.
4. In view of limited prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioners, this Court deems it just and proper to dispose of this writ petition with liberty to the petitioners to submit a representation before respondent No.2, who shall consider and decide the same within a period of 60 days from the date of receipt of representation along with a certified copy of this order.
5. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case.
6. Pending application(s), if any, also stand(s) disposed of.
(ANAND SHARMA),J DIVYA /70