1 2026:CGHC:17356 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRR No. 404 of 2017 Smt. Mamta Gabel W/o Shri Ved Prakash Gabel Aged About 28 Years R/o Parsa Tehsil And Police Station Malkharouda District Janjgir- Champa, Chhattisgarh., Chhattisgarh ... Applicant versus 1 - Ved Prakash And Oth. S/o Radheshayam Aged About 28 Years R/o Village Parsa Tehsil And Police Station Malkharouda District Janjgir- Champa, Chhattisgarh., Chhattisgarh 2 - Lalbahadur S/o Radheshyam Aged About 35 Years R/o Village Parsa Tehsil And Police Station Malkharouda District Janjgir- Champa, Chhattisgarh., District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh 3 - Rajkumari W/o Late Radheshyam Aged About 55 Years R/o Village Parsa Tehsil And Police Station Malkharouda District Janjgir- Champa, Chhattisgarh., District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh 4 - Malti Bai W/o Rajeshwar Prasad Aged About 40 Years R/o Village Parsa Tehsil And Police Station Malkharouda District Janjgir- Champa, Chhattisgarh., District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh 5 - Laxmi Devi W/o Manoj Kumar Gabel Aged About 28 Years R/o Village Parsa Tehsil And Police Station Malkharouda District Janjgir- Champa, Chhattisgarh. Presently Residing At Village Misan Saraskela Police Station Digitally signed by AMIT PATEL 2 Malkharouda District Janjgir- Champa, Chhattisgarh., District : Janjgir- Champa, Chhattisgarh 6 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through District Magistrate District Janjgir- Champa, Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh .. Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For Applicant : None present. For Respondents : None present. For State : Mr. Kanhaiya Ram Yadav, PL ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hon'ble Smt Justice Rajani Dubey Order on Board 16.04.2026 1. When the matter was listed on 08.04.2026, no one appeared on behalf of the applicant. Today also when the matter is called for hearing, no one appears on behalf of the applicant. Therefore, this Court has left with no other option except to dismiss the instant revision for want of prosecution. 2. The revision is accordingly dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- (Rajani Dubey) JUDGE AMIT PATEL