Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 73825 (MAD)

Kandasamy v. The President

WP/12717/2022 · 2026-02-18

C Kumarappan, S M Subramaniam

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:MHC:760 WP No. 12717 of 2022 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 18-02-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S. M. SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN WP No. 12717 of 2022 and WMP No. 12180 of 2022 Kandasamy S/o.Vanjiappan, E.Puliyampatti, Thattaravalasu, Erisanampalayam Panchayat, Dharapuram Taluk, Tiruppur District. ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The President Erisanampalayam Panchayat, Erisanampalayam, Dharapuram Taluk, Tiruppur District. 2. 3. M.Marithai The President, Erisanampalayam Panchayat, Erisanampalayam, Dharapuram Taluk, Tiruppur District. ..Respondent(s) To call for the records of order dated 02.05.2022 on the file of 1st Respondent and quash the same. WP No. 12717 of 2022 For Petitioner(s): Mr.N.Ponraj For Respondent(s): Mr.T.Arun Kumar, AGP for R1. No Appearance-R2. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 12717 of 2022 __________ Page2 of 4 Order (Order of the Court was made by C.Kumarappan J.) The present writ petition is filed challenging Section 7 notice dated 02.05.2022. 2. The only contention put forth by the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the said notice was issued by an incompetent authority, namely, the Panchayat President. 3. According to the provisions under Section 131 of the Tamilnadu Panchayats Act, the Executive Authority or the Commissioner is competent to issue notice to secure the removal of encroachments. If the encroachers did not remove the encroachments, he ought to have given a report to the revenue authorities, so as to proceed under the Tamilnadu Land Encroachments Act, 1905. However, while looking at the impugned notice, the same was issued under Section 7 of the Tamilnadu Land Encroachments Act, 1905, which on the face of it, is without jurisdiction. 4. Since the Village Panchayat President is incompetent to issue notice under Section 7 of the 1905 Act, we may treat the impugned notice as the one under Section 131 of the Panchayat Act and if the Panchayat President is not able to secure vacant possession from the petitioner, he is at liberty to submit a report before the Executive Authority, who in turn, shall forward the report to the jurisdictional Tahsildar. On receipt of such report, the jurisdictional Tahsildar is empowered to proceed under the Land Encroachments Act to https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 12717 of 2022 __________ Page3 of 4 remove the encroachments. 5. With the above directions, the present Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. (S.M.S.,J.) (C.K.,J.) 18-02-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No vsi To 1. The President Erisanampalayam Panchayat, Erisanampalayam, Dharapuram Taluk, Tiruppur District. 2. M.Marithai The President, Erisanampalayam Panchayat, Erisanampalayam, Dharapuram Taluk, Tiruppur District. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 12717 of 2022 __________ Page4 of 4 S.M.SUBRAMANIAM J. and C.KUMARAPPAN J. vsi WP No. 12717 of 2022 and WMP No. 12180 of 2022 18-02-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis