2026:JHHC:12388 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (C) No. 5111 of 2011 ------ Vijayeshwar Prasad Singh, son of Late Chandra Mohan Singh, resident of MIG-MA/62, Adityapur Housing Colony, P.O. and P.S. Adityapur, District Saraikela, Jharkhand .... .... …. Petitioner Versus 1. Jharkhand State Housing Board through its Managing Director, Head office At Harmu Housing Colony, P.O. Harmu, P.G. Argora, District Ranchi 2. The Revenue officer, Jharkhand State Housing Board, Harmu Housing Colony, P.O. Harmu, P.G. Argora, District Ranchi 3. The Executive Engineer, Jharkhand State Housing Board, Jamshedpur Division, P.O. and P.S. Adityapur, District Saraikla Kharsawana .... .... .... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI For the Petitioner : None For the Housing Board : Mr. Sachin Kumar, Advocate Ms. Shambhavi Sinha, Advocate ------ 06/28.04.2026 On repeated calls, nobody responded on behalf of the petitioner. However, learned counsel for the Jharkhand State Housing Board is present. On 24.11.2021 also, nobody appeared on behalf of the petitioner. In view of that, this writ petition is being disposed of in the absence of counsel appearing for the petitioner. 2. This writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for direction upon the respondent- Jharkhand State Housing Board to make the correct calculation of the amount in final costing in accordance with the agreement executed on 17.07.1978 between respondent no.1 and the petitioner in respect of MIG House No.MA-62, Housing Colony situated at Adityapur, Jamshedpur and refund the money/amount which was paid by the petitioner due to wrong calculation made by the respondents from the date of 01.03.1976 instead of 17.07.1978 when the petitioner entered into the hire purchase agreement for allotted house. 3. Mr. Sachin Kumar, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Jharkhand State Housing Board fairly submits by referring the para 11 of the counter affidavit that there is statement made in the said paragraph that the calculation chart has been made by the respondent- Board in terms of the agreement and on the basis of calculation chart, the petitioner has already paid the entire dues against the house in question and thereafter, the petitioner challenged the costing made by the respondent- Board and raised 2026:JHHC:12388 such objection against the calculation chart and prayed for waiving the interest chargeable for the period from the date of allotment to the date of agreement. He also submits that the amount has already been paid by the petitioner and in para 20 of the counter affidavit, it has been stated that the respondent- Board is ready to execute the final lease deed in favour of the petitioner, if the petitioner approaches the respondent- Board with respect to the final transfer of the property in question by way of lease deed in the prescribed format of the Board. He also submits that this counter affidavit is of the year 2013 and in view of that, if it is not executed, the Board will do so. 4. In view of above statement made in the counter affidavit, this writ petition is disposed of. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Anit Uploaded 29.04.2026