MUKESH BHATNAGAR v. EXCISE COMMISSIONER STATE OF UTTARAKHAND
WPMS/2518/2023 · 2026-06-29
Manoj Kumar Tiwari
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 7375 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 7375 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
UKHC010144362023
2026:UHC:5136 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s
order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
WPMS/2518/2023
Mukesh Bhatnagar --Petitioner Versus Excise Commissioner State of Uttarakhand --Respondent
Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.
Mr. Gaurav Singh, Advocate, holding brief of Mr. Saneep Kothari, Advocate for the petitioner.
2. Mr. Devendra Pant, Standing Counsel for the State of Uttarakhand.
3.
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner makes a statement at the bar that the writ petition has become infructuous by efflux of time.
4. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
(Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.)
29.06.2026 Navin