Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 7375 (ALL)

ANIL KUMAR NEVATIA v. U.P. STATE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND 3 OTHERS

WRIC/7814/2021 · 2026-09-15

Kunal Ravi Singh, Siddhartha Varma

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 7814 of 2021 Court No. - 29 HON'BLE SIDDHARTHA VARMA, J. HON'BLE KUNAL RAVI SINGH, J. 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner presses the withdrawal application and submits that the petitioner does not wish to press the instant writ petition and that the same may be dismissed as withdrawn. 2. Learned counsel for the respondents have no objection to the aforesaid request made on behalf of the petitioner/ applicant. 3. In view of aforesaid, writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. 4. Accordingly, the withdrawal application stands disposed of. September 16, 2026 NLY Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ashish Srivastava, Sanyukta Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : Abhitab Kumar Tiwari, C.S.C., J.P. Pandey, Mahesh Narain Singh, Vineet Pandey (Kunal Ravi Singh,J.) (Siddhartha Varma,J.) Anil Kumar Nevatia .....Petitioner(s) U.P. State Industrial Development Authority And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- NAND LAL YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad