- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:13220 RSA No. 914 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 4TH DAY OF MARCH, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 914 OF 2025 (SP) BETWEEN: 1. MRS. SAVITHRAMMA D. M. WIFE OF LATE HANUMANTHA RAJU S.L. AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS. 2. MR. LOKESH S. H. SON OF LATE HANUMANTHA RAJU S.L. AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS. 3. MR.SANTHOSH S. H. SON OF LATE HANUMANTHA RAJU S.L. AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS. ALL ARE RESIDING AT NO.5256 SUNRISE SCHOOL ROAD SUBHASH NAGARA NELAMANGALA BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT - 562 123. …APPELLANTS (BY SRI P. C. NARASIMHAIAH, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. MR. RAVIKUMAR H. K. SON OF SRI KEMPEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.38 M.L.A. LAYOUT R.M.V. 2ND STAGE BANGALORE - 560 094. Digitally signed by B LAVANYA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:13220 RSA No. 914 of 2025 2. SMT. LAKSHMAMMA WIFE OF LATE PATEL RAJANNA @ NAGARAJU S.L. AGED ABOUT 77 YEARS. 3. SRI RAVI KUMAR SON OF LATE PATEL RAJANNA @ NAGARAJU S.L. AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS RESIDING AT SRINIVASAPURA VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI NELAMANGALA TALUK BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT - 562 123. 4. SMT. LALITHAMMA WIFE OF SRI VASUDEV AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS RESIDING AT 1ST MAIN ROAD ANCHEPALYA DASANAPURA HOBLI BANGALORE NORTH TALUK - 560 075. 5. SMT.SUJATHA WIFE OF SRI RAJANNA AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS RESIDING AT DIBBUR VILLAGE HESARAGHATTA HOBLI BANGALORE NORTH TALUK - 560 088. 6. SRI GANGANNA S.L. SON OF LATE PATEL LINGEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS SRINIVASAPURA VILLAGE KASABA HOBLI NELAMANGALA TALUK BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT - 562 123. … RESPONDENTS THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE PASSED BY THE HON'BLE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:13220 RSA No. 914 of 2025 AND JMFC, NELAMANGALA, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT IN O.S.NO.660/2009 DATED 31.07.2018 AND ETC. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR ORAL JUDGMENT Learned counsel for appellants files a memo seeking withdrawal of the appeal on the ground that the matter has been amicably settled between the parties before the trial Court in O.S.No.210/2020. 2. In view of the withdrawal of this appeal, the entire Court fee shall be refunded to the appellants as per Section 66 of the Karnataka Court Fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1958. 3. Registry is directed to disburse the amount deposited by the appellants through electronic transfer upon appellants furnishing the required Bank details/upon proper identification. - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:13220 RSA No. 914 of 2025 Placing the memo on record, the appeal is dismissed as not pressed. Sd/- (PRADEEP SINGH YERUR) JUDGE CPN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 7