Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 7365 (JHR)

KRISHNA KANT SINGH v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND THROUGH THE CHIEF SECRETARY

LPA/174/2026 · 2026-04-29

Rajesh Shankar

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:12522-DB 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI L.P.A. No. 174 of 2026 1. Krishna Kant Singh, S/o Janardan Prasad Singh, R/o Q. No. B- III/497, P.O. & P.S.-Dhurwa, District-Ranchi 2. Mukesh Kumar, S/o Tribhuwan Prasad, R/o Village-Sarhul Nagar, P.O. & P.S.-Bariatu, District-Ranchi 3. Amardeep Kumar, S/o Dahan Prasad, R/o Village-Sakhiya, P.O.- Oriya, P.S.-Muffasil, District-Hazaribagh 4. Binay Singh, S/o Bilash Singh, R/o Village-Dulsulma, P.O. & P.S.- Satbarwa, District-Palamu 5. Manoj Kumar, S/o Kameshwar Yadav, R/o Village-Baero Kala, P.O.- Berokala, P.S.-Barakata, District-Hazaribagh 6. Sheo Shankar Sau, S/o Tirtha Basi Sau, R/o Village-near Children Park, Patpur, P.O. & P.S.-Baharagora, District-East Singhbhum 7. Sudhanshu Kumar, S/o Raghoram Singh, R/o Village-Khaira, P.O.- Takia Bazar, P.S.-Sasaram, District-Rohtas (Bihar) ….. Appellants Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand, through the Chief Secretary, Ranchi 2. The Secretary, Department of Health, Medical Education & Family Welfare, Government of Jharkhand, Ranchi 3. The Secretary, Department of Personnel & Administrative Reforms, Government of Jharkhand, Ranchi 4. The Secretary, Jharkhand Public Service Commission, Ranchi 5. The Controller of Examination, Jharkhand Public Service Commission, Ranchi ….. Respondents ----- CORAM HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR ----- For the Appellants: Mr. Vishnu Prabhakar Pathak, Advocate For the Res.-State: Mr. Piyush Chitresh, A.C. to A.G. For the Res.-JPSC: Mr. Sanjoy Piprawall, Advocate ----- 02/29.04.2026 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The issue raised in this appeal stands covered by the judgment and order dated 22.04.2026 passed by this Court disposing of L.P.A. No. 173 of 2026 (Vijay Kumar Mahto & Ors. vs. State of Jharkhand & Ors.). 3. Therefore, by following the reasoning in the above referred judgment and order, we dismiss this appeal without any order for costs. 2026:JHHC:12522-DB 2 4. The interim applications do not survive after disposal of the appeal and the same are consequently disposed of. (M. S. SONAK, C.J.) (RAJESH SHANKAR, J.) 29.04.2026 Satish/Vikas/