Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 7364 (CHH)

VIPIN SINGH CHOUHAN v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/5421/2022 · 2026-04-23

Shri Rakesh Mohan Pandey

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:18921 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 5421 of 2022 * - Vipin Singh Chouhan S/o Shri Krishna Kumar Chouhan Aged About 32 Years R/o MIG - 12, Near BDA Chowk, Asha Aata Chakki Gali, Raj Kishore Nagar, Bilaspur , District - Bilaspur Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner Versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Chief Engineer (Admin), Chhattisgarh State Renewable Energy Development Agency (CREDA), Head Office - V.I.P. (Airport) Road, Near Urja Shikshan Udyan, Village - Phundhar, Raipur, District - Raipur Chhattisgarh 2 - Executive Engineer Chhattisgarh State Renewable Energy Development Agency (CREDA), Regional Office, Bilaspur , District- Bilaspur Chhattisgarh 3 - District Office CREDA, Kondagaon, District - Kondagaon Chhattisgarh ... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Abhishek Verma, Advocate holding the brief of Mr. Vivek Verma, Advocate For State : Mr. Abhishek Singh, Panel Lawyer Hon’ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 24/04/2026 1. The petitioner has filed this petition seeking the following relief(s):- “10.i To call for the entire records available in the office of the Respondents pertaining to the case of petitioner. 10.ii That the Hon’ble High Court may kindly be pleased to quash the impugned order dated 20.12.2019 (Annexure P/1). 10.iii That the Hon’ble High Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent authority to reinstate / continue the petitioner to his service. Digitally signed by RAMESH KUMAR VATTI Date: 2026.04.24 18:07:42 +0530 2 10.iv Any other relief or relief(s) which this Hon’ble Court may think proper in view of the facts and circumstances of the case may also kindly be granted.” 2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition. 3. No objection from other side. 4. Permission granted. 5. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge vatti