Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 7362 (PNJ)

BIKKAR SINGH AND ANOTHER v. ROTASH BIRTHAL AND OTHERS

FAO/410/2020 · 2026-01-27

Lok Adalat Bench

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

              recorded), was (Rupees Two L concerned, in f of the Insuranc further compen MACT. deposit a crosse the name of ap High Court on p.a. from the da Adalat. The ap the Lok Adalat       !           '&&& $#()"* "#++& Mr. D.K. Prajapati, Advocate for the Insurance Company ,,,,,,, On 14.01.2026, on behalf of th ), was made by learned counsel for the Two Lakh only) more, over and above, d, in full and final settlement of the cla surance Company concurrence has been Accordingly, Rs.2,00,000/- (Rupe ompensation over and above the com We dispose of this case with a d crossed-cheque in the sum of Rs.2,00 e of appellant No.1-Bikkar Singh with urt on or before 17.03.2026 failing whic the date of this order till the cheque is he appellants' counsel/appellant may c Adalat. %"+-"#". ! !"# $#%"!&      /   of the appellants statement (separate for the appellants to accept Rs.2,00,00 above, the amount awarded by the MAC the claim in this appeal. Today, on beh s been given to this effect. (Rupees Two Lakh only) is allowed e compensation already awarded by t ith a direction to Insurance Company s.2,00,000/- (Rupees Two Lakh only) with the office of the Lok Adalat of t g which the amount will carry 9% inter que is deposited with the office of the L may collect the cheque from the office !++"#*"!+ (J.C. VERMA) PRESIDENT (ARVIND KUMAR) MEMBER   separately ,00,000/- e MACT n behalf lowed as d by the pany to only) in lat of the interest f the Lok office of + AR) ATUL KUMAR TRIPATHI 2026.02.06 14:47 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document