Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 7358 (UTT)

SUJINDER KUMAR v. EXCISE COMMISSIONER STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPMS/2522/2023 · 2026-06-30

Manoj Kumar Tiwari

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

UKHC010144492023 2026:UHC:5184 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WPMS/2522/2023 Sujinder Kumar --Petitioner Versus Excise Commissioner State Of Uttarakhand --Respondent Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J 1. Ms. Ananaya Jain, Advocate holding brief of Mr. Sandeep Kothari, learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. Mr. Rajeev Singh Bisht, learned Additional C.S.C. for the State of Uttarakhand. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner makes a statement at the bar that the writ petition has become infructuous by efflux of time. 4. In view of the statement so made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed, as infructuous. (Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J) 30.06.2026 Aswal NITI RAJ SINGH ASWAL Digitally signed by NITI RAJ SINGH ASWAL DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=eacc6757ee7881e933ff8934f07477005aa85f9802a3a08b08d1369512ea 30f3, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=44EB54CBF00B7698CB6F10C2CE3D26F5C22DACF4F4610C1FE58 A58531726FBB0, cn=NITI RAJ SINGH ASWAL Date: 2026.06.30 04:55:41 -07'00' UKHC010144492023 2026:UHC:5184