Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 7358 (RAJ)

ASHUTOSH @ AASHU S/O CHAINSINGH v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/6999/2026 · 2026-05-12

Pramil Kumar Mathur

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:19989] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 6999/2026 Ashutosh @ Aashu S/o Chainsingh, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Sanet Ka Pura, Police Station Shri Mahaveer Ji, District Karauli. (At Present In Sub Jail Hindaun City, Karauli). ----Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vikram Singh Chauhan For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jaiprakash Tiwari, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 12/05/2026 1. The petitioner has preferred this bail application under Sec- tion 483 of BNSS in FIR No.138/2025 registered at Police Station MahaveerJi, District Karauli for offences under Sections 189(2), 115(2), 126(2) and 109(2) of B.N.S., 2023 and Sections 3 and 25 of Arms Act. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Learned counsel for the petitioner has further submitted that no specific act has been as- signed to him as per the allegation levelled by the complainant. Learned counsel contended that co-accused Jallaram has been en- larged on bail by co-ordinate bench of this court on 16.12.2025 and co-accused Ramkhilari and Narayan have been granted bail by [2026:RJ-JP:19989] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-6999/2026] co-ordinate bench of this court on 17.10.2025. Co-accused Chetram has been enlarged on bail by this Court on 17.04.2026. It is also submitted that the matter has been compromised between the parties. The case of the petitioner is akin to the co-accused. The petitioner is behind the bars since 08.04.2026 with one an- tecedent in which he is already on bail. The trial of the case will take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in further custody, consequently the bail application deserves to be allowed. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. 5. On consideration of the rival submissions and material avail- able on record and in light of submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner but without expressing any opinion on merits/ demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner. 6. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioner Ashutosh @ Aashu S/o Chainsingh be released on bail provided he fur- nishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J RACHNA/58