Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 73508 (MAD)

S. KALAISELVI v. S. TAMILSELVAN

CRP/1292/2025 · 2026-02-20

S Sounthar

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

C.R.P.No.1292 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :20.02.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.SOUNTHAR C.R.P.No.1292 of 2025 and CMP.No.7716 of 2025 S.Kalaiselvi ... Petitioner vs. 1.S.Tamilselvan K.Ranganathan (deceased) 2.The Tahsildar, Office of the Tahsildar, Ponneri. 3.The District Collector, Thiruvallur District, Thiruvallur. 4.The Sub Registrar, Office of the Sub Registrar, Ponneri – 601 204. 5.The Block Development Officer, Minjur Block, Minjur, Thiruvallur District. 6.The Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority, Thalamuthu Natarajan Building, Gandhi Irwin Road, Egmore, Chennai – 600 008. 7.The Inspector General of Registration, No.100, Santhome High Road, Pattinapakkam, Santhome, Chennai – 600 028. 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.R.P.No.1292 of 2025 8.The District Registrar (Administration) Tiruvallur District, Thiruvallur. ... Respondents PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, praying to strike off the plaint, in O.S.No.21 of 2024, on the file of District Munsif Judge, Ponneri as against the 1st and 2nd defendant of the suit who are misjoinder party to suit and thereby allow the Civil Revision Petition. For Petitioner : Mr.A.Rajesh Kanna For Respondents :Mr.R.Ravichandran for R1 Mr.N.Muthuvel Government Advocate for R2 to R4 and R7 and R8 Mr.R.Thamaraiselvan Senior Counsel CMDA for R6 O R D E R This Civil Revision Petition is filed seeking to strike off the plaint in O.S.No.21 of 2024 on the file of the District Munsif Judge, Ponneri, filed by the 1st respondent. 2. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the respondent/plaintiff died on 21.05.2025 and till date, the legal representatives have not been brought on record before the trial Court. 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.R.P.No.1292 of 2025 3. Since the Legal Representatives of the first respondent/plaintiff, have not been brought on record, by operation of law, the suit gets abated. Therefore, the Civil Revision Petition cannot be proceeded. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is closed with liberty to the petitioner to revive the same, in case, the abatement is set aside and legal representatives are brought on record in the main suit. 4. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is closed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. 20.02.2026 Index : Yes / No Speaking order : Yes / No Neutral Citation : Yes / No ub To The District Munsif Judge, Ponneri. 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.R.P.No.1292 of 2025 S.SOUNTHAR, J. ub C.R.P.No.1292 of 2025 20.02.2026 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis