Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Orissa · body

2026 DAILYLAW 7350 (ORI)

NRUSINGHA CHARAN BEHERA @ NRUSINGHA BEHERA v. STATE OF ODISHA

ABLAPL/3309/2026 · 2026-04-27

Aditya Kumar Mohapatra

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page 1 of 3. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK ABLAPL No.3309 of 2026 Nrusingha Charan Behera @ Nrusingha Behera ..... Petitioner Represented by Adv. - Arada Jena -versus- State of Odisha ..... Opposite Party Represented by Adv. – Sasmita Nayak, A.S.C. CORAM: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ADITYA KUMAR MOHAPATRA ORDER 27.04.2026 Order No. 01. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual /Physical Mode). 2. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and learned Additional Standing Counsel for the State. Perused the Anticipatory Bail Application as well as the F.I.R. 3. This is an application under Section 482 of the B.N.S.S., 2023 filed by the Petitioner for anticipatory bail, involving offence punishable under Sections 85, 115(2), 3(5) of B.N.S. read with Section 4 of D.P Act, 1961 in C.T. Case No.216 of 2026 in the Court of learned J.M.F.C., Chandikhol arising out of Jenapur P.S. Case No.37 of 2026. 4. It is stated by learned counsel for the Petitioner that the Petitioner is the husband of the informant. He further submitted that in the meantime investigation has been concluded and final form Page 2 of 3. has been submitted. He further submitted that the Petitioner is ready and willing to appear before the learned trial court as and when his presence is required. Learned counsel for the Petitioner further submitted that the Petitioner belongs to the locality, therefore, there is no chance of absconding. 5. Learned counsel for the State on the other hand objected to the release of the Petitioner on pre-arrest bail on the ground of gravity and seriousness of the allegation. He further submitted that in the event the Petitioner is released on pre-arrest bail, there is every likelihood that he might cause harassment to the Informant- wife. 6. However, learned counsel for the Petitioner at this juncture submitted that the Petitioner does not want to press this application and seeks liberty to surrender before the court below and move an application for bail. 7. Considering such submissions, the Petitioner is permitted to surrender before the learned court in seisin over the matter within a period of three weeks from today and move an application for bail, he shall be released on bail on such terms and conditions as the learned Magistrate may deem just and proper with further conditions that:- I. shall not harass, threaten or terrorize the informant and her family members in any manner whatsoever; and II. shall appear before the learned trial court during trial on each date of posting, unless his personal appearance is dispensed with by the learned trial court. Violation of any of the terms and conditions shall entail Page 3 of 3. cancellation of the bail. 8. The ABLAPL is disposed of accordingly. Urgent certified copy of this order be granted as per rules. ( A.K. Mohapatra) Judge Anil Designation: Junior Stenographer