Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
SA No. 890 of 2013 __________ Page1 of 3 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 02-02-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE A.D.MARIA CLETE SA No. 890 of 2013 and MP.No.1 of 2013 M.D. Muthu ..Appellant Vs Govindan @ Govindasamy ..Respondent Prayer: Second Appeal filed under section 100 of C.P.C to set aside the
judgment and decree of the 2nd Additional Sub-Court, Tindivanam dated 03.04.2012 in A.S.No.101 of 2004 thereby confirming judgment and decree of the learned Principal District Munsif, Tindivanam dated 16.06.2004 in O.S.No.14 of 2001. For Appellant: No appearance For Respondent: Mr. N. Suresh
JUDGMENT When the matter was listed for hearing on 29.01.2026, there was no representation for the appellant, hence, Registry was directed to list the matter under the caption “for dismissal” on 02.02.2026 (i.e.,) today. When the matter is https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
SA No. 890 of 2013 __________ Page2 of 3 called today there is no representation for the appellant and hence it is clear and evident that the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the second appeal.
2. Hence, this second appeal is dismissed for non prosecution. No costs. 02-02-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No shl To
1. The 2nd Additional Sub-Court, Tindivanam
2. The Principal District Munsif, Tindivanam
3. The Section Officer VR Section High Court of Madras https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
SA No. 890 of 2013 __________ Page3 of 3 DR.A.D.MARIA CLETE J. shl SA No. 890 of 2013 02-02-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis