Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 7347 (AP)

P.KOTESWARA RAO v. G.ANAJANA DEVI

CRLRC/164/2019 · 2026-08-05

Y Lakshmana Rao

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010038872019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI THURSDAY, THE 6th DAY OF AUGUST 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 164 OF 2019 Between: 1. P.KOTESWARA RAO, Poluri Koteswara Rao S/o. Venkatasubba rao, age. 62 yrs, C/o.Geetha Super Market, 2nd floor, Sivalayam street, Vijayawada. ...Petitioner AND 1. G ANAJANA DEVI, Gandamsetty Anajana Devi W/o. V.Raghavendra rao, R/o. D.no. 1-3/28-7/1, Yaddanapudi vari street, Vidhyadharapuram, Vijayawada 2. State of AP, High court of AP, amaravathi ...Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner: A VARALAKSHMI Counsel for the Respondents: The Court made the following order: ORDER: The Criminal Petition has been filed under Sections 397 and 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for brevity, ‘the Cr.P.C.’),/Sections 438 and 442 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for brevity, ‘the BNSS’), aggrieved by the judgment and sentence passed by the learned IV Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Vijayawada, in Crl.A.No.199 of 2017, dated 28.12.2018. 2. Heard the learned Counsel for the Petitioner, the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor and the learned Counsel for Respondent No.1. 3. The petitioner is present. Respondent No.1 is absent; however, her husband, who is her GPA holder, is present before this Court. 4. Smt. A.Maheswari, learned counsel is appointed as mediator in this Case. Secretary, High Court Legal Services Committee is directed to issue necessary proceedings in this regard. 5. The parties were referred to mediation, which was duly conducted in accordance with law. Upon completion of the mediation proceedings, the learned mediator submitted that the dispute between the parties had been amicably resolved through mediation. 6. The Petitioner and Respondent No.1 have voluntarily entered into a lawful compromise, resolving all issues arising out of the present proceedings. In furtherance of the said settlement, the Petitioner shall pay a sum of Rs.2,00,000/- (Rupees Two Lakhs only) as imposed as compensation by the learned IV Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Vijayawada on or before 06.11.2026 to Respondent No.1. 7. The fee for the mediator shall be fixed at Rs.10,000/-, out of which Rs.7,000/- shall be paid by the Petitioner/Accused and Rs.3,000/- shall be paid by Respondent No.1. 8. On careful perusal of the entire facts and circumstances of the case, and taking into account the amicable settlement arrived at between the parties, this Court is of the considered opinion that no purpose would be served in permitting the criminal proceedings to continue. Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is disposed of as compromised. 9. Consequently, the judgment and sentence passed by the learned IV Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Vijayawada in Crl.A.No.199 of 2017, dated 28.12.2018 which confirmed the judgment dated 28.07.2026 in C.C.No.546 of 2015 passed by the I Special Magistrate, Vijayawada-FAC-II Special Magistrate, Vijayawada is hereby set aside. Both parties, who are present before this Court, have unequivocally undertaken that they shall not initiate any civil or criminal proceedings against each other in respect of the subject dispute in future. 10. In the result, the Criminal Revision Case is disposed of as compromised. No order as to costs. As a sequel, Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed. _________________________ DR. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J Date: 06.08.2026 JLSR 148 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 164 of 2019 Date: 06.08.2026 JLSR