Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 7344 (RAJ)

VINOD AND ORS v. STATE EDUCATION DEPARTMENTORS

CW/14860/2011 · 2026-05-19

Sameer Jain

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:21064] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14860/2011 1. Vinod d/o Bhagwanaram aged 18 years, Sector-1, resident of Ghanshyam Vihar, Punia Colony, Ward No.24, District Churu 2. Sulochana Kumari d/o Shri Shishupal Singh Dhayal, Bablon ka Mohalla, Mukam Post Tie, Tehsil and District Jhunjhunu 3. Dholi d/o shri Ram Bhagat, resident of Mitthi Redu, Post Paharsar, Tehsil Rajgarh, Churu 4. Rajbala /o Shri Bhiv Singh, resident of Dhani Mehadan, Post Jhopra, Tehsil Taranagar, Churu, District Churu 5. Sarita d/o Shri Vidhyadhar Sharma, Ward No.22, near Babosa Mandir, Tehsil and District Churu 6. Sumitra Nehra wife of Sumit Kumar Jhajharia, Ward No. 22, Punia Colony, Churu. 7. Sumitra D/o Sant Lal Huddha, Village and Post Bhakipura, Tehsil Sardar Shahar, District Churu. 8. Anita D/o Raju Ram, Mukam Post Dhani Punian, Tehsil Taranagar, District Curu. 9. Kamlesh Wife of Shri Surendra Singh, near Railway Colony, Churu. 10. Jaita / of Sanwata Ram, resident of Hapura, Tehsil Tar angar, Churu. 11. Krishna Devi D/o Shri Hari Ram, Village and post Dheelsar, Jhunjhunu. 12. Manju Kumari D/o Nahar Singh W/o Madan Lal Age 37 years R/o Village Banwas Po. Khetri Nagar, Dist. Jhunjhunu, (Rajsthan). ----Petitioners Versus 1. State of Rajasthan through Secretary, Department of Education, Government of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur 2. Board of Secondary Education Rajasthan, Ajmer through its Secretary ----Respondents [2026:RJ-JP:21064] (2 of 2) [CW-14860/2011] For Petitioner(s) : none For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Order 19/05/2026 None appeared on behalf of the petitioner on 26.03.2025 and 04.04.2025. The matter pertains to the year 2011 and even today, when the matter was called, none has marked appearance on behalf of the petitioner. Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed. (SAMEER JAIN),J 24/CHANDAN