Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 7342 (GAU)

ABU BAKKAR SIDDIQUE v. THE STATE OF ASSAM

AB/913/2026 · 2026-06-01

Anjan Moni Kalita

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010086342026 2026:GAU-AS:7674 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/913/2026 ABU BAKKAR SIDDIQUE SON OF BASER UDDIN VILL- MANDIA,P.O. MANDIA P.S. BAGHBAR, DIST. BARPETA, ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REP BY THE PP, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR H R A CHOUDHURY, P. GHOSH,MRS S RAHANA,B DAS,MR. A M AHMED Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJAN MONI KALITA ORDER 02.06.2026 Heard Mr. A. M. Ahmed, the learned counsel appearing for the accused/applicant. Also heard Mr. B. Sarmah, the learned Page No.# 2/3 Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. 2. This is an application under Section 482 of BNSS, 2023 praying for granting pre-arrest bail to the accused/applicant in connection with Sorbhog P.S. Case No.34/2026 under Sections 303(2)/317(2)/3(5) of BNS, 2023. 3. An FIR was lodged by one Sahidul Ali on 17.04.2026 alleging that in Indus Tower wherein the informant works has a mobile tower at Niz Damaka, opposite Barnagar College and on 15.04.2026, some unknown persons had stolen 10 Nos. of Lithium batteries. On receipt of the FIR, the police registered Sorbhog P.S. Case No.34/2026 under the aforementioned Sections. 4. This Court vide the order dated 06.05.2026, granted interim pre-arrest bail to the accused/applicant. 5. It is submitted by the learned counsel appearing for the accused/applicant that the accused/applicant has already appeared before the police and his statements were recorded by police. Case Diary in connection with the instant case has already been received and the same is perused. 6. Taking into account the fact that the accused/applicant has already appeared before the police and got his statements recorded and also fully cooperating with the investigation, this Page No.# 3/3 Court is of the considered opinion that the interim pre-arrest bail so granted to the accused/applicant should be made absolute. 7. Accordingly, the interim pre-arrest bail granted on 06.05.2026 is made absolute on the same terms and conditions as provided in the order dated 06.05.2026. 8. In terms of the aforesaid direction, the instant anticipatory bail application is disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant