1 APHC010084852015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3604] WEDNESDAY, THE 12th DAY OF AUGUST 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUNITHA GANDHAM CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 1301/2015 Between: 1. P.V.V. RAHAVA RAO, KRISHNA DIST., S/O POTHU RAJU, R.T.C. MECHANIC, R/O BUTTAIAHPET, MACHILIPATNAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. MADDILA ADHINARAYANA RAO KRISHNA DIST ANO, S/O KONDALA RAO, R/O ENGLISHPALEM, MACHILIPATN,AM, KRISHNA DISTRICT 2. THE STATE OF A P, REP BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT AT HYDERABAD FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND ANDHRA PRADESH. ...RESPONDENT(S): Revision filed under Section 397/401 of CrPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the Criminal Revision Case, the High Court may be pleased to set aside the Judgment in Crl. Appeal No.130 of 2012, dated 09-07-2015 on the file of the Court of the Sessions Judge, Krishna Division, at Machilipatnam in confirming the judgment in C.C.No.10 of 2010, dated 27-06-2012 on the file of the Court of the II Addl. Judicial Magistrate of I Class at Machilipatnam, consequently acquit the Petitioner/Accused and to pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble IA NO: 1 OF 2015(CRLRCMP 2053 OF 2015 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to 2 suspend the Judgment in Crl. Appeal No.130 of 2012, dated 09-07-2015 on the file of the Court of the Sessions Judge, Krishna Division, at Machilipatnam, and also release in bail pending disposal of the above Revision Case and pass other Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. NARASIMHA RAO GUDISEVA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) 2. K SAI MOHAN RAO The Court made the following: 3 THE HON’BLE SMT. JUSTICE SUNITHA GANDHAM CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.1301 OF 2015 ORDER: Sri Narasimha Rao Gudiseva, learned counsel for the revision petitioner submitted that the revision petitioner is no more and to that effect, he has filed memo along with photocopy of death certificate of the revision petitioner vide USR No.109196 of 2025. 2. Compared the name and other details of the revision petitioner and satisfied with the same and as seen from the death certificate, revision petitioner died on 12.09.2024. Record further reveals that only substantive sentence of imprisonment is imposed by both the Courts and there is no order for payment of fine and as such, this case may be abated. 3. In the result, this Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as abated. As a sequel thereto, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ________________________ SUNITHA GANDHAM, J 12.08.2026 Vns